Well good on you for not noticing race. But again, this is the subject of the thread, so it isn’t something that has gone unnoticed. And I don’t appreciate the backhanded disparaging 90,s comment.
I’ve lived in the New Orleans area my entire life and have gone to school, friended, worked with the those from the African-American community for all my life. So I think I have a frame of reference.
Again, if you’re not willing to admit that you haven’t seen a shift, you’re being naïve.
I didn’t say I don’t notice race in your example—just not a sudden uptick in representation of Blacks in the media due to George Floyd or whatever trend you think you see. The uptick seems to have been steadily occurring from my observation.
I mean, I can only report what I see and experience. If that’s naive, well, I’m comfortable with you thinking I’m naive.
The “just an observation” is kind of a joke to me. Somehow that’s discredits you from what you’re saying.
George Floyd is a representation of African-American community’s injustices. Ignoring the fact that they are over represented in the media doesn’t do the guy on the street anything.
Representation of black people and other minorities in advertising has been an issue for at least 50 years now. It has paralleled the ongoing response to racial (and other) injustices and isn’t tied either to George Floyd or Black Lives Matter.
“Black Lives Matter” definitely goes back at least to Trayvon Martin. It became a major street movement a year later in Ferguson, Missouri.
There was also Laquon MacDonald, who was shot and killed about a half-mile or so from my house back at the end of 2014. We wouldn’t even had known about it had that journalist not started asking questions. Not a shooting that was known or talked about in the neighborhood until the story broke.
it goes back further than you think. Here’s a 2005 story from NBC News that talks about interracial casting in commercials. It specifically notes a 2004 Verizon ad with a white-Hispanic husband and wife.
From my observations, the increase in minority actors in TV commercials has steadily,(yet slowly) increased from the 1970s. I haven’t seen any significant change on that front in the last few years. The uptick that I have noticed (and related to the OP) is interracial couples on TV (and more gay couples). I think it’s a good thing overall.
Speaking of representation I just saw two completely different ads by different companies with a child with (what appears to be) down syndrome. It might have been the same actress in fact, it was a little white girl wearing glasses and had frizzy hair in both ads.
The downside: mixed race couples and families, more often white man and Black woman than the converse, is the new advertising Wonder bread. Generic default.
Having that while lacking representation of completely Black couples/families … and other ethnicities too … may be loads better than white as the generic default, with exceptions only for “ethnic” products, but IMHO is still problematic in its own way.
I’d also be cautious about how this may play into intra-race colorism. The tendency within some segments of Black culture to elevate lighter skin Blackness over darker hues. Which happens some in Asian and other communities too.
I just watched The Night of the Iguana for the first time, and there’s a pair of young Mexican men working in this rundown hotel. They spend 99% of their screen time shaking both maracas and their booties while shirtless. It was rather bizarre. Otherwise, good movie, a little dated, but the maraca-playing dudes were like something out of Salvador Dali.
Possibly, although my first impression (I can’t recall having seen this commercial) is that he’s a friend of one of the family’s children, and it’s OK to have friends of different races.