I have. I’ve been working my way through Denzel Washington’s films and so far nary a stinker. Remarkable. And rare.
I’ve seen all his great films, and all of his very good ones, most several times. Today i saw Roman j. Israel, which has its issues, but by no means a bad movie. Next, the Equalizer. Scraping the bottom of the barrel soon.
Roger Ebert proposed the Stanton-Walsh Rule: “no movie featuring either Harry Dean Stanton or M. Emmet Walsh in a supporting role can be altogether bad.”
You’ll get a shape that looks a bit like a sideways funnel. It appears that the more movies you make, the harder it is to get above an average of ~$35m per movie.
At 97 movies, Frank Welker has an average of $66m per movie. Other standouts:
Warwick Davis with an average of $198m at 18 movies
John Ratzenberger with an average of $122m at 32 movies
Tom Hanks with an average of $96m at 44 movies
Samuel L Jackson with an average of $64m at 89 movies
I think it’s harder to say with people like Hugo Weaving, Stan Lee, the Harry Potter actors, etc. whether they are people with some special talent for finding good scripts, or they just got lucky by being parts of tentpole series.
Though, in the case of Mr. Welker, he seems to be the long unknown and ultimate emperor of tentpole success.
The Equalizer was a well crafted action thriller. He’s done much worse. He’s had some bad movies early on in his career. I don’t think he’s been bad in anything. He’s made the bad movies he’s been in watchable.
I actually like it. It is not one of the best films ever made but Denzel Washington’s and Russell Crowe’s performances elevate the film above crap and it was fairly entertaining.