And no concern for all of those employed by the insurance companies and the R&D workers?
As I have said before, my parents were very poor when I was born, things slowly got better until I was about 10, when my father finally graduated and got his first job. At that point we were lower middle class and stayed there until at least when I left at 18. When I went right back to very poor.
Face it, there is absolutely no way you can know what was or was not available to me at that time. No, I didn’t have the grades in the sense that I didn’t have a 4.0 but I did have far better grades than the football players who got full scholarships to the U of W or WSU, or out of state universities. There were some partial specialty scholarships available, but I couldn’t afford to accept those, if I’d qualified (I didn’t look into it since I knew I couldn’t accept them).
This really shows you have no idea what poor is. You had heat, food and parents to fall back on. I had no heat, one meal a day and no support system. The only place money came from was whatever I could earn. You were being paid to go to school, I was trying to stay alive. If you cannot see the difference, you have no idea what poverty is.
You haven’t been - all you’ve been doing is insisting I’m wrong and you are right. With no proof.
Why is it you all frequently try to change the subject? This subject is not big business - i.e., banks. Tho I do find it quite interesting that big business is always evil, but big government isn’t. As if there is any real difference in their results.
No, I’m tired of this game. You don’t live here, you have no clue and therefore I have no responsibility to you. All I’m going to say is this - apply logic. Why was it necessary to bail out those banks, and what was the result? Try thinking.