Heather Cox Richardson - Letters from an American Discussions

So, last week, there was some minor discussion about starting a thread dedicated to discussions of Heather Cox Richardson’s “Letters from an American”.

These articles can be found is several places, including Facebook, which is where I follow her, but also more permanently here:

From her Facebook profile:

Heather Cox Richardson is a political historian who uses facts and history to put the news in context

She regularly writes these letters, as general round-ups of some of the things going on in the US today, as well as around the world, and tries to place them in the context of US history, showing that most of what we’re seeing now is just the latest round in a fight that has been going on for centuries now.

It the next post, I’ll start it off with some passages from her most recent post.

July 21, 2023 (Friday)

I’ll quote a few key passages:

On June 8 the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of a lower court blocking the congressional districting map Alabama put into place after the 2020 census, agreeing that the map likely violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act and ordering Alabama to redraw the map to include two majority-Black congressional districts.

Today the Alabama legislature passed a new congressional map that openly violates the Supreme Court’s order. By a vote of 75–28 in the House and 24–6 in the Senate, the legislature approved a map that includes only one Black-majority district.

Today, assistant U.S. attorney general Todd Kim and U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas Jaime Esparza wrote to Texas governor Greg Abbott and Texas interim attorney general Angela Colmenero warning that the actions of Texas in constructing a barrier in the Rio Grande between the U.S. and Mexico “violate federal law, raise humanitarian concerns, present serious risks to public safety and the environment, and may interfere with the federal government’s ability to carry out its official duties.”

The floating barrier violates the Rivers and Harbors Act, which prohibits the construction of any obstructions to navigation in U.S. waters and requires permission from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before constructing any structure in such waters. Abbott ignored that law to construct a barrier that includes inflatable buoys and razor wire.

Mexico has also noted that barrier buoys that block the flow of water violate treaties between the U.S. and Mexico dating from 1944 and 1970, and has asked for the barriers to be removed. So has the owner of a Texas canoe and kayaking company, who says the buoys prevent him from conducting his business. And so have more than 80 House Democrats, who have noted Abbott’s “complete disregard for federal authority over immigration enforcement.”

Yesterday, on the same day that Shawn Boburg, Emma Brown, and Ann E. Marimow added to all the recent stories of Supreme Court corruption an exclusive story showing how then-leader of the Federalist Society Leonard Leo funded a “a coordinated and sophisticated public relations campaign to defend and celebrate” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to advance a bill that would require the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a binding code of ethics.

“We wouldn’t tolerate this [behavior] from a city council member or an alderman," committee chair Dick Durbin (D-IL) said. “It falls short of ethical standards we expect of any public servant in America. And yet the Supreme Court won’t even acknowledge it’s a problem.”

As signs of an indictment for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election grow stronger, Trump has taken to threats . When asked about incarceration, Trump said earlier this week: “I think it’s a very dangerous thing to even talk about, because we do have a tremendously passionate group of voters, much more passion than they had in 2020 and much more passion than they had in 2016. I think it would be very dangerous.”

It is notable that, for all their talk about law and order, the Republican-dominated legislature of Alabama and the state’s Republican governor have just openly defied the U.S. Supreme Court, which is hardly an ideological enemy after Trump stacked it to swing to the far right.

The Republican governor of Texas is defying both federal law and international treaties. After rampant scandals, the Republican-dominated Supreme Court refuses to adopt an ethics system that might restore some confidence in their decisions. And, aided by his loyalists, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination is threatening mob violence if he is held legally accountable for his behavior.

You can read the full article to see her discussions of these events in more detail. But her central thesis is pretty clear: the GOP, at all levels, is engaging in unlawful actions, for purely political purposes. I’m not sure how much more I can add to that. But I find having it all laid out so clearly to be sobering and depressing.

I didn’t know where this most appropriately lived, but a quick nod to HCR for her live stream politics chat (YouTube (and Facebook?)).

Yesterday’s was about 54 minutes, but her presentation lends itself pretty well to being sped up.

I think of HCR as yet another Doper – incredibly well read, with a huge base of foundational knowledge, impeccable credentials, and clear thought processes.

She’s a bit like an ad hoc AI program :slight_smile:

Like a doper, I also think her POV is rather easy to discern. The only reason I say that is: life is a bit of a Rorschach Test. IMHO, I can see the lens through which Richardson looks at history, but what I can’t do is dismiss her conclusions, assessments, or attempts to help us see which way this thing might be going.

We dismiss her at our peril.

I read her substack newsletter daily. She’s excellent! Always provides the historical context to what’s happening today.

Great thread. I follow her on FB and read her (usual) daily newsletters.

Took a year and half to get any traction!

I guess Trump is good for some things :smiley:

I’ve subscribed to her daily newsletter for some time now. It helps give some better understanding of what the hell is happening south of the border.

i’ve been following her for years. somehow i missed your thread.

her daily news letters are brilliant. i do enjoy when she takes a day off and has glorious pictures of maine as her letter.

I only started following her since January this year. I enjoy reading her newsletters and sometimes wait until I have enough time to read them in their entirety.

… Is this meant to be a compliment? Because I would be pretty insulted if someone compared me to AI. I don’t want to hijack the thread about it, but would you mind explaining?