Hee-haw, y'all. The 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary

and she bought the idea of her being a safe choice so she did not bother to visit her “blue wall” states such as Wisconsin and Michigan which of course she lost .

The DNC announces info on the Democratic debates. There’ll be six in 2019, starting in June, and six in 2020. They haven’t officially figured out the criteria who gets to be on the stage, but Tom Perez says it won’t just be based on poll numbers, as the RNC did it last time.

Might we, at some point, discuss the question of what Beto’s political stances are? I keep encountering articles that mention his skateboarding and guitar-playing, old DWI arrests and comments about womens’ boobs. But this is the only article I’ve seen from a progressive source that actually tackles the question of what he’s done while in Congress and what stances he took while campaign for Senate, and they are not very impressed.

Beto O’Rourke is being called the “White Obama.” But there are some differences between the two men:

  • O’Rourke married the daughter of a billionaire called ‘El Paso’s richest man.’

  • Obama married the daughter of a city pump worker.

  • O’Rourke’s mother was a wealthy El Paso businesswoman.

  • Obama’s mother earned a PhD and devoted her career to combating global poverty.

  • O’Rourke went to expensive private schools and finished with a B.A. degree in English Lit.

  • Obama earned a J.D. degree magna cum laude and served as a law professor.

Very similar. Especially key is that both surnames start with /O/; both have nicknames beginning with /B/.

Here are some excerpts from the article ITR champion linked to: (I hope I’ve pruned it enough to conform with copyright rules.)

So now, the Bernie-Bros, fesh after having elected Trump due to their relentless attacks upon Hillary, then too many voting 3rd party- now have their sights set on Beto:’

Forces loyal to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders are waging an increasingly public war against Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke, the new darling of Democratic activists, as the two men weigh whether to seek the party’s presidential nomination in 2020…“A supporter of Bernie Sanders attacking a Democrat,” tweeted Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress and a former aide to both Hillary Clinton and Obama. “This is seriously dangerous.”

Honestly the bernie-bros couldn’t be better campaign workers for Trump if they had KGB badges.

Is there any evidence that any of these “Bernie bros” are actual fans of Sanders? Or that they’re even Americans?

*Nomiki Konst, a progressive activist and 2016 Sanders supporter who is now running for public advocate in New York City,…

It started with David Sirota, a liberal activist and journalist who worked for Sanders many years ago. *

David Sirota posted on Facebook that voting for Beto O’Rourke : ".…will mean death and pain for millions of people."

"She gained a national profile as a Bernie Sanders surrogate during the 2016 campaign, and then as his representative on the Democratic National Committee’s Unity Reform Commission. "

Elizabeth Warren has formed exploratory committee ahead of a likely run.

Basically, she’s in.

My personal favorite.

Martin O’Malley makes it official: He’s not running in 2020. But interestingly, throws his support behind the still-undeclared Beto O’Rourke.

Uh, Martin? Nobody cares. Just thought you ought to know.

Re: Andrew Yang.

He probably has no chance to win the election, but if he can draw attention to the issues he’s talking about, then that would be a victory for the progressive cause. I tend to think that too much of the focus is on Medicare-for-All and the Fight for $15, which isn’t to say I’m outright opposed to these measures, but I think they somewhat miss the bigger problems we’re facing.

I care, damn you!

I’m having a hard time seeing “Let’s pay people something that’s totally just money but I’m not going to call it that for some reason, to solve problems” as a serious policy suggestion. Well, yes, of course we’re going to pay people money to solve problems. If you’re not already taking that for granted, you need some remedial classes before you can run for office.

No kidding. Plus Universal Basic Income is an interesting concept that may be useful in the future but no way is it something that should be part of a major party’s political agenda at the moment.

So…supporters of one candidate are being critical of another candidate? Horrors!

And I know you’ve been told this over and over and over again, and insist on continuing to repeat falsehoods, but one more time:

About 90% of Sanders voters supported Clinton in the general election, which is exactly in line with what supporters of the primary loser usually do. Sanders himself endorsed Clinton and campaigned actively for her throughout the general election campaign. The number of voters supporting Jill Stein was just about exactly the same as it had been in 2012, so clearly Bernie’s campaign didn’t help her.

In short, there is no reason whatsoever to blame the 2016 election loss on Sanders or his supporters. If you voted for Hillary in the primary and want someone to blame for Trump, look in the mirror.

I don’t know whether Yang takes himself seriously, but Bernie Sanders demonstrated the value of campaigning on crazy ideas that may not be that crazy after all. I can’t speak for Yang, but based on the limited amount about him that I’ve read, he seems to be a brainstorm candidate. The price of intellectual energy is that some ideas end up being not so practical, but it’s good that someone is bringing attention to the challenges of a displaced workforce and talking about what solutions to this problem might look like.

I don’t see it as part of the party’s platform currently; he’s simply putting it out there in the marketplace of ideas, which isn’t really a problem, IMO.

They shouldnt be, if they are in the same party. Look, talk up your candidate all you want. Compare him to others, even. But dont make up lies and shit just to ruin a fellow dems chances.

Yes, Sanders did. But he didnt call off his dogs. And he didnt concede until well after the decision was mathematically over.

Indeed there is- Bernie bros continued to spread GOP and Kremlin Fake news about Hillary, even after Sanders endorsed her.

Sanders didn’t have the ability to call off Putin’s dogs.

And asahi, I can appreciate a good crazy idea. Suggesting a crazy idea might not actually get it implemented, but it can still get people thinking in different ways, and maybe coming up with variants that aren’t so crazy and which actually can get implemented, and maybe you even eventually end up with something very much like the crazy idea in place. But “let’s pay people money to solve problems” isn’t a crazy idea. It’d the exact opposite of a crazy idea. It’s an idea that’s so sane that everyone, in both parties even, already does it. Suggesting it doesn’t make any progress; it just brands you as being completely clueless about how the world already works.