Wow. This is the most inane analogy I’ve ever come across with on this message board.
I am able to go up to 4 HOURS! without food, maybe I need to work on that.
Seriously tho…What?
Us eating cheese and Asians eating dog isn’t contradictory, whereas us believing that anyone who doesn’t accept Jesus will go to hell is contradictory to Asians believing in reincarnation and a set of non jealous gods
No, you only hear about the ones that don’t eat and die. They might have died even if they ate food. And the ones that don’t eat and don’t die go unmentioned.
No, I get it. This is a satire of the sort of logical gymnastics and poor analogies a theist would go through to defend his strange beliefs in his diety/dieties in the face of uncomfortable historical facts. Great work, ITR champion!
Next up: The banana, the atheist’s nightmare!
but there’s no such things as bananas. Didn’t you read the OP?
Hey just because the OP is an abanananist, doesn’t mean we can’t hold discussions about the things at the theoretical level. This is Great Debates, after all.
abananaist is now my new favorite word.
If he finds food he can become a anabananaist.
CMC fnord!
Virtually every sect of fundamentalist foodists makes claims to universalism. When I turn on my television and see a Taco Bell preacher ranting against the evils of McDonalds, I don’t hear any ambiguity in his rants. I don’t see him claiming that Taco Bell is superior some of the time, or that a few people prefer chalupas. I see him claiming that Taco Bell food is the one, sole, unique, supreme food. Likewise Hardees says that the Monster Thickburger is the ultimate burger, superior to all other burgers. And every other food cult has its own claim to be the sole possessor of ultimate truth about food. Obviously all of these claims are contradictory, and the only logical explanation is that they’re making it all up.
So exactly how many of these non-eating people do you know personally
Doesn’t work. Rabid theists have been known to claim that their god exists, and the gods of others do not exist. Taco Bell doesn’t claim that McDonald’s doesn’t exist.
Hmm, I thought the only logical explanation is that the advertisers have been paid to tout their particular artery-clogging agent. Besides that, anyone who wants to can actually try a chalupa or a Monster Thickburger and decide for themselves which is superior, not to mention that Taco Bell apparently won’t excommunicate you for going to Hardee’s.
I should’ve known chowder is a foodist
With my username what else could I be?
I can see the logic of comparing trust in food to belief in God.
Food is mysterious and doesn’t answer our prayers.
There are many books on food, together with contradictory beliefs.
People tell you that you will suffer unless you embrace food.
Food can bring joy.
Other people enjoy food too, so there is a spirituality about eating that Breatharians do not understand.
There is as much evidence for The Flying Spaghetti Monster as anything else.
It’s a bit of a shame that we can label food, describe its effects on the human body, analyse food allergies and diagnose the effects of bad diet. Thios would suggest that food is more interested in us than God.
But I’m sure God will catch up soon.
Not me personally, but my cousin’s boyfriend’s uncle knows quite a few. And there are some cites above about non-foodist.
That’s proof enough for me!
Let me get this right.
A relative of yours has a b/f who knows some of these non-eaters.
I assume you meet your cousin on occasion when her b/f is with her.
Are any of these starvation freaks about at the time?
BTW, when did you last eat?
Just a minute, I misread…so it’s your cousins, boyfriends uncle.
Hmmm, proof indeed ::dubious::
I not eating your dog!