Help me solve the real-life mystery about my late brother-in-law (apologies for novella-like length)

Post-writing preamble: After all this, I realize this is really mostly me just blogging about this whole awful, tragic mess, and what it’s done to my beloved sister, and me too since I’m also grieving for both of them. Forgive me for going endlessly on. I just can’t tell you how bereft and shocked we all are, and I guess I just needed to vent.

There is one legit medical/autopsy-related question at the very bottom, if you wanna skip ahead.

Please help me unravel a conundrum that is causing my sister even more pain in addition to the almost unbearable anguish of her husband’s sudden death ten days ago.

Early on August 22, my sister Carla’s husband, Mike (48), died unexpectedly. He hadn’t been ill (as far as Carla knows); the police and M.E. found nothing to indicate this wasn’t natural causes, most likely a heart attack. The night before, Carla and Mike had been to Mike’s class reunion party. Carla had left earlyish (well, 11PM); Mike had stayed to clean up and wind down w/stragglers.

BACKGROUND:

Mike had a history of a single heart attack 20+ years ago when he was a chef/restaurant owner and stressed as hell. (Much like most chefs.) He had a cocaine addiction at roughly the same time; hasn’t used since (again, as far as Carla knows). Also, he was a diabetic, although it was pretty controlled. His last visit w/a doctor was a year ago July, when he’d had a kidney issue and herniated disc; otherwise he was fine.

One other big health thing, which only Carla knew about–she told me only last week: In his early 30s, Mike had non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Something he apparently kept completely secret from his family (don’t ask, but in short, they’re assholes) and the majority of his friends, the reason probably being that he didn’t want to worry them, and also didn’t want their fear to add to his own. So, both self-protective and protecting others. Was treated, went into remission, end of story.

Maybe.

THE MYSTERY(/IES)

Now we get to the weird things that are troubling us, Carla especially. Oh, and just to start off with, the autopsy came back inconclusive, toxicology report pending. We won’t know anything for 4 to 6 weeks, God help us.

CLUE 1. The day after Mike died, one of his friends who had also been to the party, called Carla and said that at about 3AM, he (the friend) had been about to leave the ‘afterparty,’ so to speak, when Mike had said, “You sure you want to go? There are party favors…” Carla didn’t understand the reference (she is not exactly hip to the drug scene, to put it mildly), after which the friend explained that he assumed that meant, well, drugs, in particular coke. Friend claimed he’d said nah, it was too late, and left Mike w/the rest of the few left at the venue.

This took Carla aback (MAJOR understatement) because as far as she knew, Mike no longer used.

Before everyone leaps to the assumption that Carla was just blind as a bat and any husband/spouse/partner can easily pull the wool over another person’s eyes, I should mention that Mike/Carla live in a studio apartment, both work from home many days of the week, they spent almost all free time together, and in his attitude/behavior there was never never never any indication that Mike was using anything.

I also spent time w/Mike–he and I were good friends (I live in the same building they do), and he never had a problem with my stopping by spur-of-the-moment just to say hi or hang out. The reason I mention this is that it’s not as if he was behaving secretively, as if he had anything to hide.

Mike was a workaholic who did tech support for restaurants, and he was extremely well thought of by his clients, who knew they could count on him like clockwork. Also, Mike was just so… God, how can I sum this up?

He was quite simply one of the most straightforward and true-to-his-word people I’ve ever known. I don’t trust people easily, but he made me feel completely comfortable. He treated me as a sister and friend. Most of all, he made Carla happy and quite clearly adored her. For all these reasons and more, I didn’t just love him, I admired him greatly.

I’m not saying this admiration would be diminished if I found out he’d used coke; an addiction is an addiction. I would be saddened that his illness had made him hide something from Carla and, possibly, contributed to this tragic death.

CLUE 2. Right after the funeral, as Carla was accepting the condolences of attendees, one of Mike’s not-very-close business contacts said to her in hushed tones, “So this was related to his cancer coming back?”

Rewind to several paragraphs above. Mike had kept this cancer-from-years-ago hella secret from just about everyone, even his dearest friends. Carla said (in a nice way), WTF are you talking about, and also, no.

Tactless Business Contact: “Oh, well, two months ago he was looking tired and I asked him what was wrong and he said his cancer had returned, but this time he didn’t want to go through chemo, he was treating it ‘homeopathically.’”

Um, so… Carla had no fucking idea about this. She feels as she’s been living with someone she didn’t know. Except she knew him, she saw him day in, day out. She saw no sign whatsoever of illness.

Yes, sometimes he was tired, but not out of the ordinary considering he biked around NYC constantly in the hot summer to do his tech support stuff. Also, Mike didn’t believe in woo homeopathic shit. He was logical and cynical and mocked woo pretty mercilessly.

Also also, even if Mike were to believe in homeopathic shit because he was now desperate, Carla would’ve known if he had changed his diet or was adding some supplements like… I dunno, bat guano or whatever the hell homeopaths use. He hadn’t lost weight–maybe a couple of pounds, which seem in line with his bike riding–and just didn’t act like someone whose cancer had returned and it was preying on him, but was hiding it from his fucking wife.

Literally five days before his death, he and Carla went up to Boston for a two-mile walking tour, and they were together constantly. He was fitter than she was!

They were planning on buying a house this year. In a recent conversation with me, Mike expressed a lot of optimism–and it didn’t seem forced, I swear–about how well his business was growing, and he was enjoying the summer and just generally his usual engaged, funny, idiosyncratic self.

Oh. I should mention that after this conversation with the Tactless Business Contact, Carla contacted his doctor (the one he’d liked from last year, when he’d had the kidney ailment) to see if he’d visited her re: any cancer diagnosis. Doc said no, she was shocked to learn he’d died, and also said that even if the cancer had returned, it would be extremely unlikely to have caused a sudden death like this.

(I’m just spitballing but this seems right to me. I mean, if it had been that fast-spreading to have been the likely cause of death, wouldn’t the autopsy have found evidence of it in his organs, e.g. the liver or wherever non-Hodgkins Lymphoma usually spreads?)

CLUE 3. Now it’s time to do the awful stuff relating to financial details. Mike didn’t leave a will and so there’s no real question that everything goes to Carla. But his business needs to be dealt with since he has clients and so on, so Carla had to get into his computer, which of course was password-protected (he carries the laptop everywhere so privacy is understandable) and, also of course, Carla didn’t know the password.

Actually, a couple of days after he died, I posted about this computer problem (among other financial issues). Luckily getting inside turned out to be easier to get into than we’d feared, as it seems to have been just a basic screensaver password rather than some major privacy software.

So tonight Carla was able to get into the computer, by now less interested in the business data (at least tonight) and more interested in Mike’s email and browsing history. In particular she was looking for something related to cancer or… well, anything. But there was nothing unusual at all. Except…

Back in June (which would’ve been around the same time that Tactless Business Contact had supposedly had the conversation w/Mike), Mike had done a lookup on longterm disability insurance.

Also in June, Carla found one email to a friend–who’s on disability for drug addiction–saying something like, “Carla and I are looking into our longterm disability insurance options. What company did you go with?”

This is the first outright untruth Carla has discovered. Mike had never spoken about disability insurance w/Carla.

Important to note: this conversation ended with the friend’s response of… well I don’t remember the company. It doesn’t appear that Mike ever applied or researched this further; there are no mailed documents or emails or other sites in his browser history since that date whatsoever.

One final thing: It was also around this time that Mike, for the first time in seven years, contacted his estranged father and tried to arrange a visit. The dad wasn’t well so they never ended up connecting, which is really sad. Although I’m glad Mike seemed to have found some rapprochement with the guy, even if he was a shitty father.

And that, my friends, is what we have thus far.

=====================================================

So. What the actual fuck?

As you can probably guess, by now poor Carla is really rattled and feeling all sorts of self-recriminations, because she’s grieving and thus her emotions are all over the place and guilt is taking the center stage right now. She’s afraid he didn’t trust her with the truth about either returning to coke use, or his cancer returning.

Here are my own thoughts, in order of likelihood (IMHO):

A. Mike was feeling run-down in June, maybe under the weather. Maybe it reminded him of the symptoms of his original bout with cancer. In some weird moment of vulnerability, he told the Tactless Business Contact that he believed his cancer had returned. He didn’t go to a doctor (there are no bills, he’s on Carla’s health insurance, and the doctor he liked a lot knew nothing) but was catastrophizing.

He might have been afraid to go to the doc to confirm this–not terribly unusual–yet acted accordingly. Hence the brief disability insurance lookup, hence the getting-in-touch-with-asshat-dad, and hence the moment of vulnerability in which he mentioned to Tactless Business Contact his concern, probably assuming it wouldn’t get back to Carla or anyone else he knew/cared about. He probably wasn’t ready to tell her of his fears, not wanting to worry her yet.

Then, since there’s literally nothing else in the subsequent two months since to indicate he was sick or that he’d confirmed a diagnosis, maybe he started to feel better, realized he’d blown the whole thing out of proportion, and so there was no need in his mind to tell Carla anything.

Conclusion: Death was from a heart attack, because he was a 49-year-old diabetic ex-drug user who continually overworked himself. For whatever reason, it wasn’t conclusive in the autopsy. (I admit I don’t understand why a heart attack wouldn’t be easy to confirm, so maybe this is wrong.)

B. All of the above, plus on the night of the party, he was hanging out with the same people with whom he’d originally had some drug-using past. Because he was feeling good, or maybe because he was feeling tired, he did some coke. Not an overdose, but enough to cause problems for his heart.

Conclusion: Death was from a heart attack, precipitated by drug use, and also possibly age, diabetes, overwork.

C. Same as B, except he did have cancer, presumably non-aggressive. He didn’t tell Carla because he was working up the courage, but he didn’t have time when the heart attack hit him.

Conclusion: Death was from a heart attack, precipitated by drug use, also weakened system, age, diabetes, overwork.

(What nags at me is that it just seems so out of character for him not to get his ducks in a row. Mike was always extremely concerned about making sure Carla was happy and protected, so how could he fall down on the job here? Why didn’t he go for the disability insurance? Why is there literally no documentary evidence that he’d gone to any doctor or clinic or witch doctor or whatever the hell would’ve diagnosed him?)

D. Mike was a Colombian drug lord who was searching disability insurance because he was gonna put a hit on Carla to hobble her in some way and get that sweet, sweet insurance payoff.

Conclusion: Death was from a Bulgarian umbrella tip using an untraceable poison.

Frankly I find D nearly as likely as any suggestion that Mike was using drugs on the regs, so to speak. If he does, he was a masterful hider of it. Their studio is about 20x27. One bathroom, shared medicine cabinet. If he had any addiction that I saw, it was his addiction to frickin’ bike accessories. (He had three bicycles, including a folding one, and he just loved shopping for various doodads to help him carry around his various computer tech for his support calls.)

But seriously. WHAT IS GOING ON?

I’ll end this crazy Encyclopedia Brown mystery (adult version) with a repetition of my unswerving love for Mike. I am as straightedge and teetolating as a person can be, at least if you ignore the benzos I’m prescribed for panic disorder. (Which, in fairness, could get me some good money on the street!)

Nevertheless, if cocaine or some other substance was involved in his death, I will think of Mike simply as my wonderful, loving, adorable, empathetic, fiercely political, protective, funny-as-hell brother (I really think of him more as a brother/friend than just a brother-in-law) who made a dumbass mistake.

People make dumbass mistakes all the time that, by sheer luck, don’t cause their deaths. In this case, maybe Mike’s luck failed. Either way he was a fucking fantastic human being and I bless the day he entered Carla’s life and enriched our entire family.

Also, my poor, big-hearted sister is in agony. Carla is knocked for a loop and full of all sorts of self-recriminations, because she’s grieving and thus her emotions are all over the place and guilt is taking the center stage right now. She’s afraid he didn’t trust her with the truth about either returning to coke use, or his cancer returning. And so it’s her fault. Also it’s her fault if he was pushing himself too hard. And on and on and on.

For putting her through this albeit inadvertently, I guess I am upset with Mike. But I know his love for her was such that he’d be furious enough at himself for hurting her–more furious than the rest of us put together.

If anyone has any ideas or theories, please go on.

I guess if there’s one tangible question someone might be able to ask, it’d be this medical/forensic question: Is it possible for someone to die of a heart attack or other natural cause, e.g., aneurism/stroke/pulmonary embolism/blood clot/whatever, but not have it be easily identifiable in an initial physical autopsy?

Again, I guess this was part question, part mystery, and a bigger part venting and my needing to just write about this.

Sorry. And also, help.

IANAD, but based on conversations with too many of them (relatives, friends), yes, it is perfectly possible. Both a “massive heart attack” and a “heart attack” can kill you: the difference is that the first one is pretty evidently the CoD whereas the second… wellllll, yeah, this could have been the cause but well, I’m not going to bet my diploma on it, ok?

My father had cancer. He also had an inoperable aneurysm (inoperable because of the cancer). And he was on morphine. Ultimate CoD? A combination of the above. Root CoD? The cancer. If an autopsy found the aneurysm burst, that would be relabeled as the ultimate CoD, but if it didn’t, then no relabeling.

I can’t comment about the other stuff, but the thing about coke is…

  1. It’s a regular part of the scene at many restaurants. Since Mike was working more or less in that business, there’s a good chance he had easy access.

  2. Some people are absolutely Jekyll/Hyde when it comes to coke. I’ve never seen a personality chance so dramatic among some people. It’s like they are a completely different person when they do coke. And it usually ain’t pretty. Someone can be the nicest guy in the world, and then just insufferable whenever coke is around. Maybe it’s part of the whole “addict” thing.

  3. Workaholic? What helps you do that? You get 3 guesses and the first two don’t count.

  4. A lot of coke is laced with speed, which isn’t going to be good for someone with heart issues. The coke is bad enough alone, but with speed?

  5. Something very similar happened among my friends a few years back. One of them died suddenly after a night of partying. No one said anything to his wife, but we all knew there was a lot of coke going around that night.

N.b: I’m not passing any moral judgment on the use of cocaine. Far from it. :slight_smile: Just adding my 2 cents.

I haven’t touched coke in twenty years, but if I, with a previous cancer diagnosis, believed I’d lost my remission, I’d totally give my nose a workout. “Party favors” indeed!

I’m sorry for your loss. Maybe the tox panel will tie things together for you.

I am so sorry that you and your sister are dealing with this. My father had diabetes, and while his was uncontrolled for many years, he was told at the time of diagnosis that he would likely have a heart attack within the year. He did, and the only symptom ahead of time was that he felt nauseated. I don’t even remember if they did an autopsy - he was alone at home, so i know they investigated - something - but it was pretty much a clear cut heart attack, and we were told that immediately.

As kayaker said above, if I thought cancer had made a comeback, I would probably do something a bit reckless as well. Not necessarily on the regular, but I could easily see myself going “What the hell, why not?” when presented with party favors.

If I were you, my mind would be swirling. there are just too many weird things - like the business associate who said he was treating his cancer with homeopathic remedies. I would guess that something was misunderstood there by the associate.

My guess? He felt crappy, feared his cancer was back, threw caution to the wind, had a bit of coke, which strained his (already) strained heart. The disability query was right around the time he was fearing cancer, but he didn’t want to worry Carla. In other words, scenario A or B.

Again, i am so sorry you and your sister are dealing with this.

Did I miss where it talked about an autopsy? What did the toxicology say?

From OP:

Also, I wonder if they have histopathology from the autopsy pending as well…

I am not:
a) A Pathologist.
b) A Cardiologist
c) Omniscient

Given that, my guess is sudden death due to latent heart muscle damage causing heart rhythm irregularities. If there was damage to the Sinus Node, or some of the muscle surrounding it, that could result in fatal A-Fib.

I don’t think that any of that would show up on an autopsy, but like I said, I’m not a pathologist.

And, this event could have been precipitated by drug use.

Thank you all very much for your responses and sympathy. It really is hard enough to deal with the loss without all these questions arising from it.

I was wondering if Mike might have had a “to hell with it” thought vis-à-vis drug use–assuming he still thought he had cancer, although given his complete lack of any subsequent research or behavior changes, it’s hard to fathom he’d been diagnosed (but then, thank God, I’ve never had a terminal illness, just a relatively brief scare once that turned out harmless).

Carla is now determined to think that he was hiding cancer from her. Of course, some of the symptoms Carla is now remembering–he woke up with night sweats a few times, which is a symptom of lymphoma–are also symptoms of andropause, not to mention just eating spicy food, which is definitely something Mike enjoyed. Maybe that’s why Mike leapt to the conclusion that his cancer had returned.

As for the tox report, raventhief is correct of course. It’ll take at least another month, most likely. This really astonished me and was pretty educational, if nothing else. Law and Order makes it sound as if it’s as easy to get such reports as quickly as blood/urine drug tests one does for work or in an ER.

A-Fib… that’s an interesting hypothesis, beowulff. I had briefly looked up reasons for sudden death and that, or the other type, ventrical fibrillation / ventrical tachycardia, was one of them. But I figured it would have shown up.

The worst part of this is watching my sister go through such cycles of regret and now bitterness. She’s questioning whether she even knew Mike at all. Which as an (admittedly not entirely objective) observer, I think that’s utterly, completely untrue; yes, he may have lied to his friend about the disability thing, and yes, he may have omitted telling Carla his fears especially if they subsided; and, also, there’s the (possible) coke use. But as much of an anti-drug snob as I am (and Carla makes me look like a total libertine in that area), I don’t think that ultimately changes the most important aspects of Mike as a person, and that’s how he treated others. His generosity, his compassion, his sweetness, his playfulness, his joy in his marriage (which Carla too is questioning, because “why would he use drugs if she made him happy?”), his work ethic, and just… his Mikeness.

He had a shitty childhood and had depression issues. But I and both my sisters also battle depression. That doesn’t mean other people don’t make us happy at times. I think Carla made Mike as happy as he could be, as comfortable with himself and free to be his true self (whimsical, outspoken, intellectual) as he ever felt. Isn’t that the most one can do for someone else?

I know her anger and this questioning is part of the grieving process, especially with such complications. It’s just extraordinarily agonizing to watch. And I find myself strangely protective of Mike, his advocate during all this, in a way. Don’t get me wrong, if we learn something like… I dunno, he’d had an affair or was secretly selling drugs out of their apartment and lying to all of us… I’ll be angry and outraged as well. But if he did all that he leads* the most astonishingly ingenious double-life I’ve ever seen.

Many thanks for the ideas & commiseration so far, guys. Seriously, it’s good to talk about it.

  • Damn it. I meant led. Still hurts to say that.

Ok thanks it was a long OP and I was on my phone and didn’t want to reread for what I missed. If he did take coke with a previous heart attack he was playing Russian Roulette. Len Bias died that way and he was a world class athlete. After dealing with many death investigations given the information here I would say it will most likely come back positive for cocaine and cause of death will be heart attack due to cocaine use. There is a possibility that it was just a heart attack that couldn’t be prevented.

First–it’s totally understandable that you’d’ve missed something in the Moby Dick that was my OP! Frankly I’m surprised anyone got that far. (Or isn’t accusing me of some coke-fueled manic writing spree!)

Your suggestions wouldn’t surprise me at all. Sadly. If I may ask a few more questions… knowing in advance that no one here is “my” pathologist or doctor and you’d all be stabbing in the dark…

  1. Would death from a heart attack brought on by cocaine use take a couple of hours to occur? There appears to be some time between Mike’s time at the party and then his subsequent death, anywhere from 90 minutes to three hours. For some reason I have it in my mind that the coke would’ve had a much quicker negative effect, but then again, I know next to nothing about this stuff.

  2. Kind of a repeat question from the end of the OP, but: If it was a heart attack, due to anything, would that still be marked down as an ‘inconclusive’ finding? I understand looking further for a why, hence the necessity for toxicology reports, but surely heart damage is relatively apparent to a pathologist, no?

  3. I can’t help harping on the cancer thing, mainly because that’s what’s eating away–ugh, horrible unintentional pun there–at my sister. Would a forensic pathologist bother to note, or would s/he even find, a lymphoma if it wasn’t either the immediate or proximate cause of death (esp. if it hadn’t spread to major organs)? Reason I ask is that I don’t think my sister mentioned the possibility that the cancer had returned to the M.E. (although she had mentioned that he’d had a history of it fifteen years ago). So if the pathologist wasn’t looking for it and it wasn’t necessarily related to the cause of death, would it come up?

Thanks so much, Loach.

I have nothing to add to the medical stuff, so just a few words about the death of a spouse.

You find out weird shit sometimes. Some of it feels like huge things there’s no way you missed, and other things are really minor but they hit you hard. The thing is that we find out things about our spouses all the time that we didn’t know, but since we can ask about them or they just blend into the warp and weft of our days, they don’t really stick in our memories. The death puts a tear right through the weave and removes the opportunity to clear up those little weird loose ends, so they become big sad mysteries.

And we tie them together in ways we wouldn’t if we learned about them in real time. It’s like the difference between living your life and reading a mystery novel. In the novel, you know everything is relevant so you pay attention, where in life so much happens that we don’t take particular note of.

So, I would just say to be cautious about thinking too much about his life as a series of plot points. It’s incredibly hard to do, so don’t think I’m just thinking you can wave your hand and suddenly it’s not a problem. But do try to keep it in mind that events get distorted by later events.

I’m sorry you and your sister are going through this terrible time.

Lots of people do coke on occasion recreationally without being addicted to it, especially if they have been drinking and if he was drinking till 3AM his system was already under stress from the alcohol intake. As another poster said coke has killed young athletes in their prime dead. A diabetic, ex heart attack, work stressed, maybe cancer having 49 year old who had been drinking all night and then snorting coke recreationally dying suddenly is not a particularly big mystery. Honestly the drinking alone might have killed him with those prior health issues stacked up against him.

Article
Cocaine is ‘the perfect heart attack drug’ - even if you only use it only a few times a year

Remember too that he was at a class reunion. He may have seen people that he used to do drugs with, and the nostalgia could have contributed to falling back into old ways, if only for that one night.

Some chemotherapy drugs also cause heart damage; I have a distant relative who had to have a heart transplant due to doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Maybe it caught up with him this way?

First, I’m so very sorry for your family’s loss. What a horrible and unexpected blow.

Some addicts can hide usage really, really well. I lived with a Vicodin/speed user (Vic was daily; speed was more occasional) for four years before realizing what was going on – and we also lived in a small space and spent a great deal of time together. Given this experience, I might recognize someone else using now, but maybe not and I don’t know if a coke user would be able to so effectively hide use.

My sister’s 20-year-old fiancee had a mild heart disorder he had been diagnosed with as a child and dropped dead 5 minutes after he tried coke the first time. :frowning:

I hope that whatever the outcome is, definitive or vague, your family can find some peace.

Did Mike take any heart medications? I know of someone who wasn’t supposed to drink alcohol because it could interfere with her heart medications, but chose to drink anyway, and literally dropped dead. I wasn’t there to witness it, but she reportedly passed out mid-conversation, and in spite of CPR, was dead by the time the ambulance got there. It wasn’t the first time she’d ever had a drink, it was just the first time she’d had a cardiac event while drinking, and the meds weren’t able to do their job because they were suppressed by the alcohol, if I understand the scenario correctly.

She was in her mid-20s.

I don’t know if she took anything else that night, but I know who she was with, so I doubt it-- it wasn’t the sort of crowd to even have pot much less coke or LSD or anything.

Diabetics can have blood sugar events from alcohol. I’m not personally clear on exactly what all the finer points are, just that you have to know how to count the alcohol as a total sugar, and check your blood sugar, something people who get really toasted may fail to do. I have no idea what death from a blood sugar event looks like, though, and I also don’t know how or whether there would be any blood sugar testing after death as part of the autopsy.

I guess that just muddies the water more, but all I’m trying to say is that there are probably a host of ways circumstances could have converged to cause Mike’s death without his needing to do coke or have metastatic cancer.

Wait for the final autopsy results.

I would put my money on A or B. Just remember that the term “heart attack” is an an imprecise term. There are several reasons that somebody can have a sudden death from heart causes but let’s break them down into 2 basic categories:

  1. Blockage of a coronary artery leading to decreased blood flow to the heart.
    -This can be because of closing off of an already narrowed artery because of atherosclerotic disease or can occur in an artery that is relatively open but has an unstable plaque that ruptures suddenly, or from sudden spasm in an artery that is otherwise clear.
    -Autopsy in this case may show the blocked artery but won’t necessarily show the heart damage because there isn’t time for an inflammatory response or for muscle damage to manifest. The autopsy may show the blockage in an artery but will show nothing in the case of spasm.
    -He had a history of a prior heart attack so may have had blocked arteries and had diabetes which predisposes to atherosclerosis.
    -Previous chemotherapy and radiation can damage the blood vessels and the heart leading to predisposition to disease.
    -Cocaine can cause coronary spasm.

  2. He may have had a heart rhythm problem (most likely ventricular fibrillation) leading to sudden death since if the heart is not pumping effectively, blood cannot reach vital organs.
    -Autopsy usually won’t show anything since again, there is no time for inflammation to occur and there are no structural abnormalities.
    -Prior heart damage (from a heart attack, radiation, or chemotherapy) can predispose to arrythmias.
    -Cocaine can predispose to arrythmias

FWIW- in my state, the ME would refuse this case (trust me I’ve tried to get an autopsy on similar patients and been turned down). The thinking is that somebody with diabetes and a prior heart attack in their 20s, as well as treatment for lymphoma is at such high risk for a cardiac event that there is no point in investigating further and that an autopsy would likely not be useful since it would likely be inconclusive.

The only additional question I would have is the cocaine, and the toxicology should answer that.

Lymphoma should show up on an autopsy. I can’t imagine that they wouldn’t look at the lymph nodes and if it was obvious enough for him to actually get a diagnosis, it should be obvious enough for the ME to see it. Perhaps the friend misunderstood and he was merely worried about cancer coming back with the weight loss.

Please keep us posted on what you find out.