Yeah, I got that - I looked at all the cards and read the descriptions. Like I said it coincidentally sounds awkward. I can’t get that worked up about it. But then I can’t get worked up about defending it either. It merits a shrug.
Considering all the cards that WOTC has pulled over the years, I find it interesting that these particular cards are what inspired the OP and his call to arms.
Let me get this straight, because I’ve never played the thing and may be misunderstanding you.
The card for “destroy all black creatures” is called “cleanse” and the card for “destroy all white creatures” is called “Virtue’s Ruin”? Is that right?
If so, and if you can’t see anything racist about that, you need to back up ten steps and scrub your eyes open.
Cool, cool. So what, though? What fraction of Commander games are sanctioned? People can play by whatever rules they want at the kitchen table.
The fact of the matter is that as soon as people brought attention to these cards, which essentially no one plays anyway, they would become a lightning rod for dicks to show off their extreme dickitude by bringing racism.dek to the next event just because they can.
Not sure why you think that’s relevant, but there are multiple people publicly stating the claim that certain cards are racist. I’ll add my name to the mix. Invoke Prejudice and those other cards are racist. The banning was a good idea. The idea that WotC should publicly point to individuals of color who have asked for this minor concession so that the hordes of socially maladjusted internet assholes could hound them to no end “just asking questions” about why certain cards deserve to be banned is absurd.
I will admit that I’m not quite sure why Jihad is ban-worth and Army of Allah isn’t, but I’m also aware that just because something doesn’t offend me, that doesn’t make it inoffensive. I wasn’t aware that “Stone-Throwing Devils” was a slur, but now that I am, I’m not in favor of it.
Because one of them is named Cleanse. You seem to think that the mechanics of these cards are the relevant factor, but they’re not. There are all sorts of cards in Magic that treat creatures of different colors differently. The only one that got banned is the one that’s named for a euphemism for racial genocide, an actual real-world atrocity that some people desire, and that others are victims of because of the color of their skin.
lol no. So much crazy shit has gone down so far this year but this still stands out as one of the most over the top dumbass clownish requests that I have seen.
It’s not a collector’s number. It was sequential number of cards printed. And that the number 1488 just happened to be Invoke Prejudice is a coincidence. If Alpha has not missed two cards it wouldn’t be that. If beta wouldn’t have added third land card it would not have been that etc. It is a coincidence and nothing more. No-one preplanned that to happen. And Harlod McNeils art is very abstract and you can read what ever you can imagine in those. And so what? Invoke Prejudice against whom? I could play that in blue-black deck where my creatures are all black and thus it would prejudice against red, green, whitre and blue creatures. And that is racist you say? Then the whole game of Magic is racist and should be banned. But it is not. Yours: Topi
How is Invoke Prejudice racist if not the whole MtG is racist? If I play blue-black deck with only black creatures and play Invoke Prejudice it invokes the prejudice against all red, green, white and blue creatures. Is that racist? NO! And about the picture itself. No-one would have batted an eyelash if that cards multiverse id was 1490. No-one cared about the picture. Harold McNeils pictures are abstract and if you want to read in it KKK burníng black viillage you can, but that is not the point. The point is that abstract pictures raises several different images in viewers imagination and they are all correct. So you cannot ban a picture by one opinion. Yours: Topi
Most people aren’t stupid. This is why most slippery slope arguments fall apart.
Most people can understand the difference between “this card is offensive towards black people because it depicts the KKK eliminating black creatures” and “this card is offensive towards the Blue Man Group because it depicts a dragon eliminating blue people”.
Then (assuming you are an American) you are old enough to remember Klansmen robes, and your arguments are specious. You can claim you don’t see the violently racist imagery, but again, unless you grew up well outside of the US zone of influence, you know it’s there, and you condone it.
I don’t know enough about white supremacist organization (thankfully) in the 90s to know if 88 was in use as coded Heil Hitler, so I can’t speak to that part.
But the choice of action combined with the imagery screams white supremacy, and you claiming you don’t see it is either bullshit, stupidity, or dangerous naivety. Take your pick
Magic: The Gathering is a card game in which two players try to eliminate each other from the game. The theme is fantasy based and the cards depict things like magical spells and fantasy creatures.
There are five factions in the game, each with their own different theme. The five factions are represented by colors; black, blue, green, red, and white.
If you’re familiar with Harry Potter, think of it as the equivalent of Gryffindor, Slytherin, Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff.