Inspired by dbx820 in the Elections thread on Bachmann, where there was some discussion of the Republican debate last night and Herman Cain, including
He pretty much flubbed his response when asked to clarify why he said he would have an issue hiring a Muslim to his administration.
Some quotes here: Herman Cain Pressed on Muslim Loyalty Test in GOP Debate | Politics
Cain clearly has some disturbing anti-Muslim prejudice. A decent summary is here. I found him to come off very creepy indeed.
It’s pretty clear to me from that that Mr. Cain views Muslims with a much higher level of scrutiny with respect to their loyalty to their country than non-Muslims. Whether that is warranted or not is up to the viewer (obviously the crowd agreed with him - he received much applause).
I so do not want to hijack this thread, but:
I really have to wonder what people like Herman Cain and Juan Williams are thinking when they openly and clearly state that they are prejudiced toward people because of their appearance, having themselves no doubt been heavily subject to that very same prejudice.
There are two ways to respond to prejudice directed toward you: 1) reject such prejudice and appreciate that people have different backgrounds, upbringings and views of the world or 2) redirect that prejudice toward a weaker group.
We know which course they chose.
Is that it? What’s going on here? Is the response to minority-group members who say such things unfair in any way?
(Here’s a past Pit thread on Juan Williams.)