Hysterically over the top much?
If a pregnancy is terminated then there never was a baby.
Hysterically over the top much?
If a pregnancy is terminated then there never was a baby.
Child. Its a child.
He shouldn’t have to claim custody. The mother shouldn’t be able to give up the child for adoption without the consent of the father. A father can’t take his child from the hospital and give it up for adoption. The mother doesn’t have to go to court to claim custody, why should the father?
I didn’t scream murder fuckface I said kill. And yes abortion is KILLING YOUR CHILD. You can deny it all you want but whatever that is in the uterus is your child and you are ending its life.
Scarlett-
Are you planning on adding anything here or just making stupid ass comments?
Its also a baby
And I guess a sperm is a teenager, huh? And a fertilized egg is a middle-aged woman?
It’s people like you who make me wish I could get pregnant, just so I could go out and have an abortion to piss you off.
If you are pro-life (and I’m pro-life-leaning myself), I don’t see how you justify “two wrongs making a right.” So an abortion is wrong. Fine, I totally understand that. So how does that make child abandonment and shirking your moral responsibility right? How is that good or fair for the kid?
I am sorry if it bothers you that a fetus is a child and a baby. Don’t get all pissy at me becuase of the fact that abortion is killing your child.
Piss me off? It doesn’t piss me off that people get abortions its their conscience they have to live with killing their child.
That last sentance doesn’t make sense. Add a period after conscience and capitalize the ‘t’ in ‘the’.
Looks like somebody managed to shoehorn a false definition into the dictionary.com site. It’s wrong, of course.
You have no fucking hint of a clue what you’re talking about.
In order for a father to have any rights, you moron, he has to tell somebody he’s the father. What are the courts supposed to do, guess who the father is?
A woman CANNOT give up a child for adoption against the will of the father. All he has to do is assert his rights. However, if no one is willing to come forward and identify himself as the father or contest the adoption then there is no reason to get his permission.
Hysterical, deluded bullshit. It’s not a child, no matter how much you scream that it is.
Sorry. I don’t find your screaming assertions to be very convincing. A blastocyte is not a fucking “child.” Has screaming ever made any of your other fantasies come true? Maybe you can conjure up a three way with Coors Light twins.
Oh excuse me what was I thinking taking the word of a fucking dictionary over yours Diogenes.
You went to court before your children were born and sued for custody? Or did you put your name on the birth certificate when they were born? If you waited for the birth certificate too bad becuase your child could have been gone before you even knew it was born. All I want is for some consistancy. Mom can’t give child up without the consent of the father and Dad can’t give up the baby without the consent of the Mother. Whats so fucking unreasonable about that?
If he knows. My cousin, happily married for the last five years, suddenly found out that he was the father of a thirteen-year-old girl, thanks to a previous girlfriend. He had no clue that his ex had even been pregnant. Now he’s paying back child support, by the way.
A rare circumstance, to be sure (hopefully!). The point is, though, that if his ex had put the girl up for adoption, he would never have known that he was a father. He would never have known he had to assert his rights.
eight.
If you’re going to use an analogy, at least make it as accurate as possible. Let’s say your friend planted the acorn, and it started to grow, and then your friend came back, having realized it wasn’t a good idea, and tried to convince you to pull the tree out of the ground, or cut it down when it grew, but you refused and let it grow, and then it fell on your house.
Is he responsible then?
Actually, this is your opinion, and a fine one to have too! I totally respect your right to hold it. I don’t share it, but I respect your right to hold it. Calling it a fact, however, does not make it a fact. I can call my chair a glider, but if I roll out the window on it I’m not going to glide much.
There have been plenty of Pittings of women who, while technically “raising” their children, ignore crucial responsibilities. Women who leave their children in locked cars in the summertime while they get their hair done, for instance, are routinely referred to as “fucking scum”.
catsix, you’re making it sound as if hauss’s GF is asking him to pay 100% of the cost of raising the child. He’ll only be required to share the expense.
Live and learn.
Nobody was trying to put my kid up for adoption, numbnuts. How easy do you think it is for a woman to do that?
One more time: A woman can’t give up a kid for adoption against the will of the father. If the father wants the kid, all he has to do is say so. When a woman goes to put a kid up for adoption, they will try to assertain who the father is and get his permission. The only way they don’t get permission is if they can’t figure out who it is and no one comes forward.
Dave-
Child and Baby also refer to fetuses. ‘Chair’ does not refer to ‘glider’.
When you are talking to a pregnant women you ask ‘Whats your babies name’ or ‘Is this your first child’. You don’t go well it looks like you are 9 weeks along what are you going to name your blastocyte. You don’t say it looks like you are 24 weeks along and ask if its your first fetus. If you want to sugarcoat it and ignore the fact that its your child and you’re ending its life by calling it a lump or cells or a fetus by all means do so.
Its your body do what you want with it but that fetus inside of you is your child it is your baby and if you get an abortion you kill it.
Extremely easy. She walks up to a hospital, firestation, police station or any participating facility and leaves the baby there no questions asked. The hospital then takes it and puts it up for adoption.
One more time. A mother can give birth and then drop off the child at a hospital providing no information. No questions asked. The hospital has no chance of finding the father and the father as far as I can tell has no chance of finding the baby. After the Mom drops the baby off it goes up for adoption, what did you expect it to magically poof out of existance?
Incorrect, douchey. It doesn’t work that way at all.
Incorrect, douchey. If a father wants custody, all he has to do is say sobefore the kid is born. If he tells a court he wants the kid, then the mother will not be allowed to dump it at a safe haven (at least not without being charged with contempt of court).
No they don’t.
I can go into a restaurant in Pittsburgh and ask for a “pop”. They will bring me a soft drink. I can do the same thing here in LA, but I’ll have to tell them that I want a soft drink. They’ll say “Oh, you mean a soda,” and bring me a soft drink. In Texas, they’ll say, “Oh, you mean a coke. You want Coke coke, Pepsi coke, orange coke?” Then they’ll bring me the kind of soft drink I request.
A soft drink is a soft drink no matter what you call it. A fetus is a fetus no matter what you call it. And it is not a child, no matter how vehemently you insist that it is.