We didn’t really need any more examples, but thanks anyway for being one.
Examples of what?
You still prosecuting this cheating thing? Is this grammar school?
People didn’t vote based on delivering “justice” to Hillary for cheating, any more than they did to deliver it to the goldfish for lying (both to and about them), cheating, theft, sexual assault, corruption, fraud, and possibly some capital offenses to be named later. What are you on about?
So if you can’t conflate things with slavery just call the other guy a racist… I don’t know where you think you are but that sort of argument never worked here absent an actual expression of racism.
Hopefully this thread will prompt you to re-examine everything you thought you knew for a fact.
(it’s taking longer than we thought)
This is a thread about Hillary’s campaign. I think it’s fair game to discuss thngs about the campaign. Call me crazy.
Well, at first she denied it:
But eventually she fessed up:
Didn’t you know? Or is cheating not a relevant issue for you?
OK you’re crazy. I didn’t say you shouldn’t discuss it. Have at it. But get real.
Get real, would ya? At long last…
I don’t care about the debate questions scandal. I was just quibbling with your saying “are you still prosecuting this?”. This whole thread is about rehashing the election. Except for the slavery bits.
Apparently, Hillary would have won if it wasn’t for slavery. 
It’s always a good sign when a thread on modern politics devolves into a discussion of the Secession War, as our German friends call it.
Back to basics !
Whipper Leakers ? Is she related to my dear old friend C. Montgomery Burns by any chance ?
Are you asserting that the emails that went on Wikileaks were not actual emails, but instead were invented by the Kremlin (or the GOP)? Because the DNC and Hillary Clinton don’t support your view that those emails were lies, just that they didn’t want them to be public. Do you have any evidence that they are fabrications, or are you just mad that some of Clinton’s underhaned dealings were made public, making the already weak ‘Saint Hillary’ message even weaker?
If this story gets out, I don’t think history will look too kindly on the institution of slavery.
Specify, please.
(Underhanded or underhaned, if your post was intended as product placement. Wait’ll we get our Hanes on you!)
If you don’t care about it why would you object to reminding someone here that they are still prosecuting this?
Have you seen any of the many the other posts and threads saying this same thing? No dialectic, no weighing of events, values or contexts. Just this one little fucking thing that is supposed to end all discussion? Give me a ferakin break.
It doesn’t end it. It doesn’t even begin it. It’s a preoccupation that has no values or perspective behind it. Get real.
Does anyone know what this post is supposed to mean?
Nope. But I will reiterate that I don’t care about the debate question thing, and since he doesn’t buy my clearly stated reason, I leave it to drag dog’s wildest imaginings as to why I said what I did.
There are 20 posts on “cheating” by the clinton campaign under the stated conditions. By the same poster. This you don’t follow? Sorry.
Then using the same standard, 73,684,412 people voted for someone other than Donald Trump. And every point I made stands.
Correct.
Not correct. It is your opinion that the voters chose Hillary. An opinion not supported by the data, and so is not a fact.