So now you’re going back to saying untrue things about me? Cite, or retract.
That’s what the evidence shows, don’t it, adaher?
There’s a character question involved here, yes - but not necessarily hers, yanno. Think about it.
My goodness, absolutely clear ownership and apology!
And exactly how limited are the amounts that can be given (openly or otherwise) to SuperPACs?
For example, the Koch brothers were at one time planning to spend nearly $900 billion on the 2016 election. How much access do you think that would buy?
900 Million not billion. They ain’t that rich.
Don’t want to sound like clickbait, but this latest commercial by HRC has completely pissed off the Trump campaign:
Yep, my bad. Sorry about the fingers getting ahead of the brain.
Still, close to a billion dollars far exceeds any individual donation to the Clinton Foundation (which has raised around $2 billion during its 15-year existence).
If Sheikh Mohammed Al-Amoudi’s donations to the Clinton Foundation (which may have totaled up as much as $10 million) brought him some undesirable access, how much access would $889 million have bought?
I was looking for Adaher to acknowlege this actual cite, with facts included and everything, and admit he was wrong, but I guess he missed it, so I thought I’d bring it back to his attention.
In fairness, if adaher’s clicking practices are anything like mine on this board, he’s not going to click on a blind link with no description or context.
Yep. And also your opinion of what’s there.
It is a link to the nefarious FactCheck.org.
Thank you for the information.
[quote=“JohnT, post:790, topic:753873”]
Don’t want to sound like clickbait, but this latest commercial by HRC has completely pissed off the Trump campaign:
[/QUOTE]It’s ad with KKK members and people like David Duke talking about they support Donald because he (Donald) supports things that are important to them. I don’t feel like sitting through it again to check, but it seems to be people talking in their own words about their own feelings for Donald.
I’m sure Donald’s people are angry, but they can’t really object to the facts to presented. Not that facts mean anything to Donald’s fanbase.
Hillary pretty much tore out a new asshole for Trump today and beat him up one side and down the other. Those clips on the evening news will be the lead story. Now that she’s up by a good margin in the polls she can go ahead and lay into him and cut his numbers. Trump needs to be roundly defeated by crushing numbers, and it’s looking like Hillary sees this as much of a civic duty as anything else.
It gets an A rating from Charity Watch, with 88% of spending going to programs, and the rest to overhead.
Truly shameful. :rolleyes: