[QUOTE=Contrapuntal]
Here’s the problem. Scientology is insidious. It is an extremely powerful cult that essentially brainwashes people under the guise of religion. Undoubtedly it is capable of presenting sound moral values in easy to read pamphlet form. But the devil can quote Scripture, eh? Still, one needs to treat everything out of his mouth as blasphemy. Or so I’ve been told.
For another religion to justify Scientology, even tacitly, by accepting it’s teachings sets a very dangerous precedent. Especially when there is no need. You said yourself, everything in that book is sound Christian doctrine. What’s the point?
[/QUOTE]
The point is, obviously people respond to it, so why not subvert use the power of the so-called Devil for the “good” of Christianity? Recontextualize it in the Christian framework, and nobody has the need to “defect” to Scientology. That said, before this thread, I had no idea that book was related to Scientology. If someone handed it to me as an example of good Christian ideals and living, I would be none the wiser and would have accepted it as that. The fact that it happens to be put out by Scientologists does not change my opinion of the advice contained in the book.
My main point was to refute the notion implied in the OP that somehow the article you linked to claims Scientology and Christianity are complatible. The article says no such thing and, as I have repeatedly pointed out, the main person in the story–the priest–says plainly they are not in agreement with each other.