Has anyone ever seen God and Curtis in the same room?
It seems you’ll need to bring a new argument Curtis. It is not even remotely clear that arsenokoitai means homosexual.
(not that I care if it’s considered a sin by christians, you’re welcome to believe whatever you like)
That was from Levisticus and Mosaic Law.
So you obviously don’t adhere to the 10 commandments right?
You claim to believe in god. Who made the gays? For crying out loud they are born that way. It is who they are. Are you questioning gods work? There have always been gays. Why is that.?
Well, come to think of it, no. On the other hand, I’ve never seen Miley Cyrus and Curtis in the same room, either.
From God, to Hannah Montana, to Curtis…
So if we abolished marriage we wouldn’t have these problems? I note that you only addressed one of my points whilst quoting the whole section. Women still exist, why should they be silent in church, obey their husbands, submit etc? Do you believe that too?
And how do you plan on doing that? Particularly “stop them from sinning”? :dubious:
You will have a damn hard time convincing me that my sexuality is a sin (whatever the hell that word means), and an even harder time turning me away from it. Don’t even try.
Start with Pride/Hubris first, work your way up to the more complex sins later.
In which case I’m doomed, doooooomed I tells ya
Interesting that the homosexual offender translation does not seem to be correct, as the way you determine definition of an archaic word is contextual, and apparently a cleric writing in period wrote it with the contextual meaning of anal sex, within the bounds of heterosexual sex…
And legally in the US sin has NO basis for law. Keep your religion out of my pants, thanks.
Then don’t preach, do it by example. The more you preach, the tighter ears are closed.
I seem to vaguely remember Jesus as saying I come not to replace the law … and nowhere did I ever read in the new testament that he recommended chucking all the mosaic laws…he considered himself a jewish rabbi … never did he state he was there to do anything more than offer himself.
Thank the various apostles and authors of different books for making christian law.
Mathew 5:17 - “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”
What that means exactly is unclear.
Jerome translates arsenokoitai as concubitores masculorum, a term with considerably less ambiguity. It almost certainly does not mean homosexual but male prostitute.
The problem remains; you’re asking people to deny a part of who they are, a part that for most people is accepted to differing standards. A straight person can fulfil their sexual desires to some extent without being sinful. A gay or bi person cannot fulfil those desires at all, without being sinful. Moreover, that for a gay or bi person, romatic love is an impossibility and must be shunned. Love is, so far as I can tell, quite important in the Bible and in Christianity as a whole. To have a group of people essentially entirely cut off from one form of that greatest of ideals, to say to them in fact that love is good but not for you, seems mercilessly cruel.
In some Christian sects, homosexuality is a sin. In some sects, it’s not. The bible can be and has been used to support just about anything. One interpretation is pretty much as good as another.
Why?
I mean some “sinning” is really pleasant.
Especially the whorin’ and the drinkin’ and the swearin’ and and …
I’m curious as to the answer as well.