Hong Kong, 2047, and the current protests.

Arrests have happened instead of beatings, for some.

Kids boycotted school.

Things are still ramping up:

Things have not escaped Beijing’s notice, of course:

As noted above, tho, the protestors have goals:

Lam renews calls for dialogue; billionaire sides with protestors!

Things haven’t slowed down in Hong kong.

I am very curious about what the phrase “chemical-laced blue water” means.

The protests are disrupting “business as usual” and they are drawing escalating responses.

Don’t know if this counts as “Western-splaining” or what, but this was a sight to see:

Western woman lectures protesters, tears down protest banners

I watched the video.

:eek:

Who is this tool?

From “China’s online gambling problem”:

A whole bunch of people ignored the Tool Lady’s advice and demonstrated but things eventually got out of hand:

My understanding is the water is dyed blue, therefore if you’re protesting and get hit with the water cannon, then you’ll stick out like a sore Smurf until it wears off. Much harder to fade into the crowd (and HK is always crowded).

Aye; I was just concerned that “chemical-laced” could include the introduction of some kind of irritant. So far I haven’t heard anything to confirm or support that worry so I’ll chalk the phrasing up as a poor choice of words.

Don’t know if anyone will find it interesting, but here is a YouTube video from Al Jazeera English, their YouTube Channel, talking about Hong Kong, though the title of the video is “How will China’s communist party manage challenges to its rule?”. Not sure I agree with the people on the panel, especially Gordan Chang(?) who seems to think that Beijing’s options are much more limited than I feel they are, but it is an interesting discussion if anyone is interested. I don’t know if I mentioned this, but one of my favorite channels, China Uncensored has done a huge series on Hong Kong, and they are actually there right now (this is the second time they have traveled to report directly from the protests). Not going to link to that, as it’s something like 10 or more videos, but if anyone is interested I can give a link to the main site, or you can look it up yourself if you like.

Basically, the short version of what I linked to is asking the question of how Xi and the CCP will deal with the multiple challenges facing China, including the trade war, disputes with neighbors including those in the South China Sea, and, of course, the big one right now…Hong Kong.

Hong Kong ‘semi-paralyzed’ as ban-defying marches persist

:rolleyes:

“What is not important is that everybody comes out to say ‘No, society will not accept loss of self-governance.’”

As much as I despise Carrie Lam, she is stuck in between a rock and a hard place. She can’t defy her Beijing puppet-masters, but it can’t be fun to be in a city where millions hate you and you face a not-insignificant chance of assassination. And by withdrawing the criticized extradition bill, she may have run afoul of aforementioned Beijing masters.
But yes, her words are a classic case of blaming the victim.

I agree, Lam is screwed either way. But she made her bed . . .

The protestors themselves are organized in an unusual way - there is no organization. Or at least there is no organized or central coordinating body (AIUI). This not only protects them from infiltration and surveillance, it makes calling on “them” to stop, or to do anything as a cohesive whole problematic if not impossible.

The lack of a central command may protect the protestors, but it also has its downsides. Even if a large majority of them wish to renounce violence, or drop the masks (or not), or do anything as a unified front, they would seem to have no way to coordinate except through whatsapp and word of mouth. Not only would the message not reach everyone, but there would be some cliques or subgroups who may do the opposite. This makes it easier for the CCP to tar the whole movement with an unrepresentative brush. Xi or Lam can focus on the actions of a subgroup of demonstrators and label them as representing the whole group and thus justify to the non-HK Chinese (and maybe even the world at large) that ‘harsh measures’ are required.

Which is why I won’t be surprised if when this all shakes out we see the emergence of a new kind of democracy, where technology helps everyone have a voice on ddamned near everything.

The Houston Rockets posted a message in support of Hong Kong protesters, only to retract it under heavy backlash from China. Now they are facing a backlash for retracting it.

It looks like Beijing has about had enough, perhaps: Lam says Chinese military could step in if uprising gets bad.

Basically, everyone is now acknowledging that this is a revolutionary movement.

“No longer a peaceful movement” is a really polite way of saying “violent crazy people with no purpose but to cause havoc and woe” but the underlying meaning (“they’re going to deserve what we are about to give them”) stands out pretty well, I think.

It is fascinating to me the ways in which technology is being employed in this struggle. This story was up on the AP this morning: China criticizes Apple for app that tracks Hong Kong police.

In a nutshell, the app allows people to post things that are happening at a location which is then placed on a map of Hong Kong: police are gathering at this intersection; they’ve fired tear gas in this park; etc.

Beijing doesn’t like this:

They’re laying it on heavy, albeit through third and fourth parties at the moment:

I think people should get to work and make as many of these apps for as many different cities as possible as fast as possible.

ETA: I also posted this information in a thread in GD on China’s influence on free speech in the west.

The AP reports that all trust between protestors (and a significant portion of the public, it seems) and police is now gone: