Hostile Dialect; A Word, Please.

I’d add the slight caveat that the rule is particularly strong in MPSIMS, the most social forum on the board. Ivan’s comments were mostly inappropriate for the forum.

That discussion is, uh, interesting though I’m not prepared to accept that furrydom can be dismissed as a mere hobby, or at least not for a lot of folks. And my eyeballs just about rolled clear in back of of my skull over even some of the tamer chat in the MPSIMS thread. People can do whatever the hell they want as long they don’t harm others or clog traffic in passing lanes. More power to 'em, long may they way but this being the Dope and all, we’re still allowed to think they’re ridiculous. I rank furries somewhere down with Scientologists, though they’re more pathetic than dangerous.

Missed the edit window.( I was distracted.)

Tomndebb = straight, veering towards “Furry”.

Ah, the ‘making up shit about people’ route. This is going to go great.

Are you categorizing people by whether or not they, themselves, are furries? What does “neutral” mean?

Oh, what the hell, I’ll take it. Maybe it’ll liven up my image around here! :slight_smile:

LOL I’m so not a furry. Do a search for my name, I’ve posted about my sexual orientation at length.

I did ask first. I’m just trying to get an idea of the sort of numbers I’m up against. It’s easy enough to weed out who’s who in the original thread, but I was hoping to see if they had a militant branch. I’ll go with…er…neutral for yourself, Marley23. Am I right?

p.s **‘neutral’ **means ‘doesn’t give a damn’, as opposed to ‘straight’, which means a little unnerved.

Are you sure?

Ivan, you’re hopelessly outnumbered. Forget furries, pal. They aren’t your problem. It’s you vs. anybody with a lick of sense.

Are “furry” and “straight” mutually exclusive, or is this just a guess at dominant tendencies?
I’m not a furry, though I started a thread about a CSI episode that discussed them.

Do a search on her name with “slave.”

Wow…I thought you were joking. If you really think it’s important to know who’s who, I suggest you go back to the other thread…and read for comprehension this time.

You really are a spastic little monkey, aren’t you, ivan?

It’s entirely exclusive. “Furries” like sexy animals and dressing up, ‘straights’ get a little creeped out by the passion involved.

Not suspicious in and of itself, but I’m going to question your subconscious motives, all the same. While I’m pondering my denial about my gayness. :wink:

You mean the non-idiots?

Are you calling me a “Furry”? I resent that remark.

Not to pile on (well, yes, actually; specifically to pile on), but why use the word “straight” to mean “[is] a little unnerved [by furries]”? That would appear to be at odds with other uses of the word (e.g., in its most common sexual use (to denote heterosexuals), straight people are not necessarily unnerved by non-straight people).

Damn, who would’ve thought the furry thread, inspired by a pit thread, would spawn a pit thread?

Straights, i.e. right-thinking people, should properly be unnerved and suspicious of the [del]queers[/del] furries.

Of course, this misses the whole point in the other thread that the whole business isn’t just about sex. But you can’t make as much fun of that, so it’s off to the races he goes.

By those definitions, I’m neither furry nor straight.

Not you, doof: Hostile Dialect. In light of his posts to the recent “asexual” thread, clearly he’s so humourless about his gayness that he can be set off by with the slightest effort. He’s the unexploded World War One munition of queerdom.