I think when we talk about freedoms we SHOUOLD be talking about basic freedoms.
IMHO, most talk about freedoms from government become mooted as soon as you give everyone the vote. THE ONLY people who can seriosuly bitch and moan about freedom from taxes are the folks living in Washington DC who do not have any representation in congress (BTW congress rules DC like a communal fiefdom, no wonder its so screwed up).
When we talk about freedom, we talk about the freedoms that we must maintain in the face of a popularly elected government. What freedoms must we maintain no matter who is in power and regardless of how dire the circumstances? Freedom of speech comes to mind (the ability to criticize the president (something that a lot of democracies do not have, in some countries, its treasonous to criticize elected officials) but freedom from taxes just seems like a bunch of people whining about paying too much tax.
I would put a star next to this post if I could. When it comes to economic freedoms, you are basically picking your poison and finding the balance that works best in your society.
Not to take this hijack any further (but I guess I’m about to); isn’t there serious room for debate about when human life begins? A zygote? Probably not but when the baby starts kicking, maybe so.
Then why do people keep complaining about how high taxes are here.
BTW, I find the attitude that each individual should get services from government in some proportion to what they pay in taxes absolutely reprehensible.
Its a pretty accurate statistic. What it doesn’t take into account is payroll taxes, sales taxes; state taxes. But even if you iclude all that the rich pay a higher tax rate than the poor. So if you are against progressive taxation then this should really piss you off but if you believe that the tax burden should be distributed progressively then you just sneer at the whiners.
Uh, no, not really. How many countries openly allow anyone to go live there?
Yes, a useless concept.
Trying to couch everything in these “freedom” terms is just an attempt to use language to control the discussion. It’s like how instead of having plans to deal with drug abuse and poverty, we have to have a WAR ON DRUGS and WAR ON POVERTY. It’s using language to frame the debate in such a way as to crowd out actual discussion.
In this case, people are simply trying to wrap up what they think is simply good policy in terms of a fundamental human right.
Btw, I’d suggest you stop creating posts so prolifically. Making 10+ in a row makes you look weird. If you have that much to say, you can wrap multiple replies into one post.
Specifically, if one clicks on the icon on the bottom of a post that has large quotation marks on the top, one can then scroll to subsequent posts doing the same thing, finally clicking on the Quote button only for the final quoted post. At that point, the Reply screen will pop up with all the quoted posts listed in order.
… do you want the long answer or the short answer ?? … the short answer, “They’re not.”… the long answer, “The people of Europe do not have fewer freedoms than Americans.” … in other words it is all swings and roundabouts … and of course the personal perspectives of the peoples of the respective countries … your freedom is my constriction … my freedom you don’t appreciate …