I know there have been a lot of cites posted and maybe it was answered and I didn’t see it. Trump holds 60% of the company. How much actual money did he put into it or did someone waive a magic wand and say he has 60%? If he didn’t sink any significant cash into it then even if the price tanks he still would have made money from nothing, just not as much.
I don’t know for certain, but I expect he didn’t put any money into it. He likely got the 60% by agreeing to restrictions on his posting. That is, the requirement that he post things on Twuth instead of other social media.
Thanks, the 136M is what I was missing. The link below also quotes the 136M number and clarified that DWAC converts to DJT at 1:1. There are about 37M shares of DWAC so there must be about 100M of TM&T.
I guess the capital raised by DWAC at IPO and PIPE goes to the new company after the officers get their share.
I wonder if the DWAC shareholders knew they were only getting a fourth of TS? These SPACs seem like huge scams even without TS.
Nothing has ever stopped Trump from perpetrating whatever illegal scam is convenient at the moment, but the real question is what lender would accept as collateral a stock holding that is not allowed to be used as such. It would have to be a really convoluted and sleazy underhanded arrangement, and when that kind of money is involved, I imagine the deal would get a lot of scrutiny from regulators.
The SEC will give him a day he’ll never forget. As I mentioned, their fines for egregious, premeditated offenses usually take the form of “all your ill-gotten gains plus a bazillion dollars.” They like sending unmistakable messages to the offender and the general public.
To those worried that Trump will just flout the rules and do what he wants, you have to understand that the SEC leadership is cut from the same piece of cloth as Fani Willis, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith, et.al. They don’t give a shit what gets posted on TS or about any MAGA outrage. They have all the leverage and they can bring down a world of pain. Nothing Trump can do about it except waste money on delays.
I don’t think he put any money into Truth Social. A couple of former Apprentice contestants approached him with the idea of a Twitter ripoff and agreed to let him retain 90% of TS in exchange for his name and association with it. And then they rounded up some known Trump donors/sycophants for the seed money including the guy who controlled DWAC, which got more investors on board but diluted Trump’s ownership slice.
But like I’ve said before, I’m just guessing and have no idea how any of this shit works.
Technically a SPAC is a type of IPO. I just don’t know enough about the details of how a SPAC works vs a traditional IPO (which I’ll just call an “IPO”.).
The SEC link says:
“A SPAC goes public as a shell company using an IPO for the purpose of merging with or acquiring a yet-to-be-identified private operating company. Generally within two years, the SPAC combines with the private company via a de-SPAC merger, with the resulting company becoming public and receiving a combination of the SPAC’s IPO proceeds and additional capital from a private financing.”
I assume that means the SPAC shares aren’t traded on an exchange like regular IPO shares? Or they are somehow restricted to be used as part of some future merger?
According to Fidelity, " If sponsors fail to create a combination within two years, the SPAC must be dissolved and all funds returned to the original investors . The sponsors lose not only their risk capital but also the not-insignificant investment of their own time."
The SPAC itself does an IPO normally, although it is trivial since there is nothing to value. All of the capital raised goes into escrow for purchasing future companies. After the IPO, they can also do additional fundraising to add to the escrow.
Exactly. Plus in this case one of the directors discussed the deal with Trump before forming the SPAC which is not legal.
It’ll be interesting to see who is holding that empty bag. Institutional investors with armies of bankers advising them when to make a move, or main street chumps who bought into the whole facade. Will this be the biggest “fleece-a-rube” scheme yet?
I think the latter. Savvy investment advisors know when an investment lacks fundamentals. Those with brass balls might try a “greater fool” strategy to quickly get in on (and out of) the grift before the bubble bursts. But the suckers left holding the empty bag will likely be MAGA faithful or the usual day-trading speculators who talk themselves into something.
Yeah, I’ve been thinking about that. There’s gotta be a lot of destroyed wealth from True Believers who thought they were helping Truth and Trump. That’s money that could have just been donations to the RNC or an affiliated PAC.