Sadly, I think not. I think he actually believes his own drivel.
At least now we don’t need an Onion article.
I can suggest some research into the general consensus in Norway about how this atrocity more than anything demands that we uphold our principles of humane treatment of criminals, no matter how heinous the crime. Also, you could read the statements from the kids who, you know, actually were there and ran for their lives. So why don’t you just let us take care of our assholes the way we think is the right way and rather concentrate on your own asshole?
FYI, some civilized nations have abandoned the medieval penal system of dungeons, hangings, drawing and quartering. I’m proud to be living in one of them.
Somehow I doubt that this is what Jesus had in mind with his whole ‘suffer the little children’ thing.
Oh, the tragedies of mis-translations!
She let the teenage one go home to his mother, and Ren was a duel. So it was 87. (Sophie was not killed.)
Well, before the teahouse slaughterfest, we see her kill three people - Vernita Green, Buck, and Buck’s customer.
I thought 95 was the total for the whole movie, not just for The Bride. If so, you’d have to count all the killings at the chapel, and Michael Madsen (can’t recall the character name), and I’m not sure who all else.
You are obviously ignorant of the case. He did not stand his ground. He was running all over the fucking place.
Well, there’s that guy Lucy Liu beheads over the comment about her ancestry, right?
[QUOTE=The New York Times, April 18, 2012]
Arguing that he had acted in his country’s defense, and likening himself to American commanders who authorized the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, he said, “I ask that I be acquitted by the court.”
[/QUOTE]
:smack:
:smack:
[/QUOTE]
Ah, the Monsieur Verdoux defense, as Chaplin would tell him, Verdoux still was declared guilty anyhow.
Well, he does, at present, have access to three cells rather than the usual one. And the mail he has been allowed to get includes some love letters from women suffering from Bonnie and Clyde syndrome, as it will for most notorious criminals. So I suppose there are two nuggets of truth in this pile of hogwash. Blind squirrel, nut, the usual.
(The only references to his food preferences I can find are from the original detention hearing, when he demanded he not be served halal food. The judge basically answered, Um, fine, you realize that’s the default for prisoners, right? And that you would have to specifically request halal food? Because that stuff costs extra, and we’ve got a budget to keep.)
The premise of “multiple counts of self defence” reminds me of the excellent Half Life Machinima series, Freeman’s Mind
(Series here, it’s worth nothing that this is one scenario where it really is a few dozen counts of legitimate self defense)
He went further into his defense:
[QUOTE=The New York Times, April 19, 2012]
Mr. Breivik compared the Knights Templar to Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network, saying “If you look at Al Qaeda before 9/11, it was becoming established. After 9/11, it became established.”
[/QUOTE]
I’m American, but I just thought this bore repeating.
Can’t blame the media here - it was the official court translator who made the guaffe.
So he’s using the “some people just need killin’” defense?
Looks like it. I know this is an international story and everything, but I wish he was on Judge Judy. (I know, I know, there’s no way he would be.) I could just see Judge Judith Sheindlin as the judge.
Breivik: It was in self-defense…
Judge Judy: Do. Not. Speak.
Breivik: But the Americans dropped the Atomic-
Judge Judy: Listen to me.
Breivik: If you look at Al Qaeda before 9/11…
Judge Judy: Listen to me. You killed 77 people!
Breivik: …it was becoming established.
Judge Judy: Mr. Breivik, you killed 77 innocent, defenseless people. I don’t want to hear any of your ridiculous reasoning. Bailiff, get him out of here!!
I think if he appeared on Judge Judy, he wouldn’t even recognise the court’s authority since she is Jewish.
In fact, he’d probably invoke a similar principle that Israel used to ignore an international court ruling because it didn’t have any Israeli judges on it.