Sorry, absent a compelling case on your part, I don’t see much point in bothering.
And that pretty much ends the discussion right there. But hey, I’ll keep going for a moment.
Just like you, apparently, I have no idea. But you raised the issue. Go ahead and present your evidence. You know, the evidence that for some reason you aren’t currently presenting.
Sorry, I have no interest in hypotheticals. If you’ve got some kind of actual event to debate, have at it.
No, YOU went through this but the rest of us refuse to engage on such a preposterous argument. You have effectively made your argument non falsifiable because no amount of contradictory evidence will satisfy you. Or rather, all contradictory evidence is automatically invalid. You only care about this one person, this one incident, and this vast web of assumptions you have crafted.
Discarding contradictory evidence is the first sign of a conspiracy theorist at work.