OK, duh, sorry, somehow it didn’t connect that the offense the guy was convicted of was separate from the allegation referenced in the OP. My bad.
Sorry, wring for letting my emotions get in the way of my reasoning. There’s a tremendous disparity in the percentages cited between the US and Canadian studies. Perhaps it’s because the Canadian study looks at a longer period of time after the initial crime, which suggests to me (total WAG) that more pervs wait a few years before getting up the gumption to try again.
I am REALLY disinclined to devote much time to this sickness, but I’m interested in knowing the rate of, for lack of a better term, psychological recividism or more specifically, do they actually ever stop wanting to molest children? It seems to me that it would be tantamount to someone “stopping being gay”, IOW, not likely. Again, I could be off base there.
That a low percentage of them get caught molesting children again doesn’t give me the warm fuzzies, since it’s a crime generally committed in private on people that may not be as likely to report it or be able to testify.
This guy needs to be impaled by a dozen tuna. 
Hooker.
OMFG! :eek: :eek: :eek:
This is a really fucked up statement, An Arky.
Burning baby girls? Yes, shit happens. Doesn’t mean it is an accepted aspect of culture. Legally and socially, it is considered murder, and is punished as such. Way to tar an entire society based on a few terrible incidents you may have heard of.
Perhaps you also think Indians ride elephants to work every day? We put that little red dot on our forehead, sit on our elephants, and just burn those damn girls. Oh happy, happy days.
I apologize for an admittedly flippant remark.
I don’t think the way you characterize me.
Also, the OP stated the the lawyer defended the molester by saying he didn’t know it was wrong, part of the reason for that being that he was from India. An Indian lawyer inferred that there is a cultural difference between India and the US regarding child molestation. Perhaps you should ask him what he meant by that.:rolleyes:
An Arky wrote:
What is your point here? What if I confided to you that I cannot stop thinking about blowing off people’s heads in traffic? That I should be locked away as a hopeless felon-in-waiting? You’d have to lock up half the u.s.a. for that, buddy.
If you didn’t mean that we should imprison people for thought crimes, then what is your point?
There’s a difference between thinking about committing a crime and acting on it. You presumably know that shooting people is wrong. I think Arky was advocating we lock up those whose conscious doesn’t get in the way of their actions.
In other words, those who know what they do is wrong but do it anyway.
As in prostitute? That’s not too far from my guess, which was ‘strip club’.
Just realized I meant “conscience” when I said “conscious”. Words sound too much alike.
Perhaps the judge should have asked him that? Fer cryin’ out loud, the lawyer was doing his job, defending his client. Your continuing attempt to link that to his ethnicity is distasteful.
The lawyer is trying to get his client off, by hook or by crook. If he said anything about there being cultural differences between the U.S. and India regarding attitudes towards child molestation, he’s an asshole and a liar.
Doesn’t mean you have to be one too. (An asshole, that is.)
Still, you did say that’s not how you normally think. Fair enough, then…I can accept that. Matter closed.
Whoops. Didn’t notice gouda’s post.
(Where you been, man?)
Here an’ there, fighting ignorance an’ all that 
Happy New Year!
Shit!Jeff Olsen, sorry for hijacking your OP.
I hope that turd of humanity rots in hell.
I’m very sorry, I really ran off in a ditch on this one. Yes, I’m really more pissed about the lawyer using cultural differences to spring his client (for child molestation), which I think is appalling. He in effect slandered his home country just to get some crazy child molester off the hook. People who lie for a living are beneath contempt.
Once again, I sincerely apologize for my poorly conceived remarks.:o
Nope. I just think that they (child molesters) need a whole shitload of psychological help and need to be evaluated very carefully before just saying “ok, you can go home to mommy now”.
And if you confided to me that you coudn’t stop thinking about blowing off people’s heads in traffic, I would very strongly recommend that you get help, and if you didn’t, I’d tell somebody in your family, etc. what you told me.
The key is “couldn’t stop thinking about it”; that’s probably not normal. Anybody who drives to work in a big city may entertain thoughts of blowing people’s heads off (I sure do), but it’s not a compulsion.
The boy’s father took him to a hooker?
How is that different from the original assault?