If I’m not the only one who didn’t know the particulars of the bill, there’s a fact sheet here.
[/QUOTE]
The important particulars are that the administration violated the limits of the FISA according to a FISA court judge. Therefore the congress with Democrats help made the violations legal. Thus giving the a;dministration leave to violate the new limits.
Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) voted yes. My Senators, Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow (both Democrats) voted no. No surprise there. If Bush sponsored a bill declaring that the sun rises in the east, Levin would vote against it just out of spite.
My congresswoman, Doris Matsui (D, CA) voted Nay. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D, CA) also voted Nay. Senator Barbara Boxer (D, CA) didn’t cast a vote on this one; had she, I guarantee she’d have also voted Nay.
[QUOTE=straykat23]
My congresswoman, Doris Matsui (D, CA) voted Nay. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D, CA) also voted Nay. Senator Barbara Boxer (D, CA) didn’t cast a vote on this one; had she, I guarantee she’d have also voted Nay.
[/QUOTE]
Sites on the net such as this one list Feinstein as voting “aye.”
Seems like this one split the Democrats pretty badly, huh? And I notice already that the more strident websites of activism are going after those Democrats who voted “yea” with a vengeance.
I’m reminded of 1968, where the riots were in Chicago and not Miami Beach.
The Democrats have to decide whether they are going to be a governing party or an activist party, and issues like this are the decision point.
I usually like my representatives. (I live, in theory, anyway, in Illinois’ 5th.)
Feinstein is a bizznatch. I usually vote for Dems, but I voted for the Green candidate last time she came up for election. (I was in California at the time, obviously.)
[QUOTE=Mr. Moto]
Seems like this one split the Democrats pretty badly, huh? And I notice already that the more strident websites of activism are going after those Democrats who voted “yea” with a vengeance.
I’m reminded of 1968, where the riots were in Chicago and not Miami Beach.
The Democrats have to decide whether they are going to be a governing party or an activist party, and issues like this are the decision point.
[/QUOTE]
Gee, you’d think a governing party would actually govern instead of allowing the executive and the Republicans to reduce our freedoms further. Fer Og’s sake, they basically put Alberto Gonzales in charge of deciding who gets eavesdropped on! ALBERTO GONZALES!