So, no sinsemilla, then?
Good thing there was no problem then.
Looks like there are enough loopholes to cover everyone, then.
People tend to choose their moral codes by what’s easiest for them to live with.
Well, somewhere in Paul’s letters (don’t really have time to look it up now) it says that Christians must also be subject to the laws of the land. So, if you’re tokin’, and the (earthly) law says that’s not allowed, then as a Christian, you’re breaking God’s law as well.
Yeah, there’s also cases (especially depending upon where you live) of laws that are explcitly against clear-cut Bibilcal laws, can’t recall how that works (I think it’s “Follow God’s law first, if it’s not clear or i silent, follow the earthly law.”)
I think when it comes down to the reasons individual, Bible-believing Christians divorce, it often comes down to that time honored cry, “Yes, but my case is different!” We used to have a regular poster here who strongly opposed homosexuality and who believed non-Christians, including Catholics, were going to burn in hell. As we got to know her, we found out that she had divorced and remarried twice. I consider divorce immoral, although sometimes the best of a bunch of bad alternatives, so I asked her how she could oppose homosexuality so strongly when, if I applied Bible-based standards, she, too, was living in a state of sin, and that was pretty much the answer she gave. She also believed God would forgive her sins, as do I. God seems to be a fairly generous Fellow when it comes to such matters.
Besides, I haven’t noticed Catholics being that strongly against divorce in practice. A former boss of mine once went to some lengths to get an annulment some years after his divorce because the woman he intended to marry wanted a traditional, Catholic church wedding and the only way they could be married in church is if he got his first marriage annulled. As far as I know he saw nothing wrong with it and I kept my mouth shut.