His4Ever, JerseyDiamond and Joe_Cool are hypocrites.

These fine Christians would have us believe that they are compelled by their beliefs to point out just out evil some of us sinners are.

Yet they ignore their own sins:

So Joe, once you and Jersey marry and start rolling in the hay, you are both adulterers. And the fact that you know this and are still going to marry means you are as unrepentative about it as I am about being gay.

And His4Ever, why aren’t you stalking them around the board denoucing their adultery? Could it be that you are a hypocritical bigot?

Probably one of those civil commandments, clearly distinct from the moral ones.

Don’t assume things Homebrew.

I never expected you to be anything more than a jackass, but you should find out what you are talking about before you decide you are right.
Which by the way, you are not. And that is all the explanation you deserve since you put it the way you did.
You are so pathetic. I feel sory for you!

His4ever isn’t stupid like some. She finds out the details on what she is talking about before she decides something is wrong.

You tried though. Failed, but tried.

Love JD

Oh, do enlighten us.

:rolleyes:

Nice way to throw it back on him and say nothing to prove him wrong, Hypocritina.

Does that mean that you and Joe won’t ever have sex?

Maybe she got it annulled. Or maybe she’s just an ass.

Could be either, really.

And this thread is productive how? Will it be cathartic somehow? Is it some kind of vengence thing?

Nope, carrot, the Bible don’t say nothing bout no annulments, and they shore ain’t Cathylicks.

So 'brew, I assume you have a cite for me showing that one or the other has been previously married? ('Cos I didn’t even know they were engaged until yesterday.)

Oh, and what about the “saving for the cause of fornication” disclaimer? Reckon that might be their out?

Do you assume that all Doper’s are going to be jackasses, or just those who don’t agree with you politically? (or is there personal history here and I’m jumping to conclusions?) :confused:

Hmmm…should preview…

But you stated that you ‘expected’ him to be a jackass…I’m wonder why you would expect that of someone basically?

JerseyDiamond:

Hi. You don’t know me, but I’ve read a lot of your posts, as well as those of your fiance. I can see that you don’t feel that Homebrew’s post is worthy of a response because of its tone. Although I don’t presume familiarity with you, as we don’t know each other, I’d like to offer that the substance of Homebrew’s question is something I’ve wondered about myself. Obviously you are under no obligation to answer my questions, but I hope you understand that my interest is sincere.

Is it true that either you or Joe_Kool have been married before?

Do you feel that, by marrying again and functioning as husband and wife, that you will be going against the letter, if not the intent, of the passage that Homebrew quoted from the gospels?

I apologize if this has already been visited in another thread that I may have missed. Thank you.

c

In all fairness to Joe Cool and Jersey Diamond, I haven’t seen either of them telling people that they’re going to hell or that they’re behaviour is sinful recently. I realize that we are probably going to disagree on homosexuality until Judgement Day, but I can’t see this changing that situation, and I haven’t read either of them say anything objectionable in a long time. Last time I thought I had, it turned out to be on another message board, and it was my error in accusing one of them of having done so.

Now, if you want to get into an impersonal knock-down drag out about divorce and adultery vs. homosexuality, it could be fun, but can it wait until after Thanksgiving? I’ve got people waiting for me!

CJ

Well, unless Jersey’s previous husband is dead.

Best laugh I’ve had all week!

She probably isn’t denouncing their adultery because I’m pretty sure she is also divorced and remarried.

In all fairness, as much as I disagree with Joe_Cool and JerseyDiamond, and, whoo boy, do I disagree with them, I haven’t seen them condemn anyone.

Perhaps we can salvage a debate out of this before it becomes a witchhunt.

Homebrew, you’re being a total asshole.

That you would use the wonderful and celebratory act of marriage as just one more stone that you can grind your anti-religious axe against is despicable, hateful, and jerkish, and untrue besides.

Joe_Cool and Jersey_Diamond, I’m sure you won’t get an apology from the right person, so here’s mine: I apologize for the never-ending, disingenuous attacks on your life and your love.

As long as you’re handing out apologies in general, Ace, can I have one? It won’t take much effort, you can phrase it just like the last one you did.

Yikes.

Ah, yes . . . That’s the wonderful and celebratory act that gay and transgendered people are not allowed to participate in, right?