I am in the market for a laptop and looking to spend an amount of money that would give me one that has integrated graphics rather than a dedicated graphics card. Probably in the $400 range but if it is worth it I’d go up to $600, dedicated graphics usually run higher than what I’m looking to spend.
I am wanting a laptop that can also double as a desktop station for gaming (or use an HDMI port and wireless mouse/keyboard to game on the TV), but am not sure how to determine whether a laptop has good graphics or not just based on reading about it online or looking at models in the store.
I am currently gaming on a fairly mediocre desktop that has a stock GeForce 7050 / nForce 620i which according to videobenchmark has a score of about 56, so nothing special. But at that resolution I am able to play most of the games I like to play like left 4 dead, team fortress, counter strike, civilization, etc. The resolution isn’t great but that doesn’t really bother me. Other games like L4D 2, team fortress 2, bioshock, etc I have bought on sale but the card and system in general is not good enough to run the graphics. Now that I am researching the issue, I may pick up a $40 graphics card that will do a better job.
If a laptop comes with integrated graphics can you pick up a $50 graphics card and have it installed or do integrated graphics more or less prevent that?
Are there external devices you can attach through one of the ports that will process the graphics for you?
The integrated graphics of the models I am looking at are things like Intel HD 3000, or Radeon 6520G. The 6520G gets a 452 from benchmark, I have heard the Intel HD 3000 is roughly a 300 or so. Considering that I am currently using a card that scores a 56 either is an improvement. But I don’t really even understand what the benchmarks measure in real world terms.
From what I’ve read the Intel 3000 is not very good for gaming but the Radeon integrated graphics seen in toshiba models is passable. Does anyone know? I went on youtube and looked at video of graphics of games like L4D2, resident evil 5, COD, etc done on intel HD 3000 and they were pretty good graphics. However on RE5 the fps rate sometimes dropped to 6. I have read several people say the Radeon integrated graphics are better, but have no idea if that is just intel bashing or if that is coming from people with standards way higher than I have (like I said I’ve been using a GeForce7050 for a while and it mostly works ok). The Radeon graphics for games I can find on youtube are good too, I don’t really see a difference between that and the Intel HD 3000.
Keep in mind I’m used to fairly mediocre graphics, so I’m not looking for top of the line. Just stuff that’ll let me play games on Steam on a laptop station. The graphics I see on youtube for the Intel HD 3000 on left 4 dead are a lot better than what I’m getting on the current desktop setup.
Other than a good graphics card, high RPM hard drive, good processor and decent amount of RAM (this is all on a fairly low cost laptop system of $400 or so) are there other things I need to look for to do midrange gaming?
I might just end up getting a tower devoted solely to gaming for a few hundred since upgrading the graphics card will be easier, but if possible I’d rather get a laptop that can double as a gaming station.