There is something, Whack-a-Mole, that we (almost) all take for granted: That the people to worry about are Arabs, Muslims, and are linked to O. bin Laden. We have been told this by the press and, later, by some parts of the government.
Firstly, I’ve never heard it mentioned on TV, but a couple of days after the attack, the WSJ published (front page) a list of what organizations lived in the WTC. The top four floors of one of the towers were totally occupied by four different TV stations. The TV news folk appear to be neutral, but they all must have [good] friends killed in the (manned, winged) bombings.
Secondly, nearly all of us believe that the “attackee” was the United States. The assumption was that the bomb which hit the Pentagon was first looking for the White House (but got scared off?) or maybe the State Department (couldn’t find it?) before it flew into the Pentagon Bldg. What we do know for certain was that the attack was against the World Trade Center and that the only other (?) previous attack of this nature was also against the WTC. It is not clear to me that anyone can definitively say that the target was the U.S., as contrasted to “Internationalism” or “World Trade”. In fact, “World Trade” has recently been under a lengthy sequence of attacks, most recently in Italy and a year ago in Seattle and that those attacks have been increasingly violent.
Finally, there is ALWAYS the very real possibility that someone other than the bin Laden organization was “using” the individuals who attacked the WTC as “cannon fodder”–the infantry who are sent to their deaths but who don’t really care. (I think that the term came out of the new Republic of France, whose Chief-General was a great believer in artillery. Many patriotic French Republicans volunteered and went to their death in the name of Republicanism.)
I’ve said all this because it makes a great deal of difference who is behind any military operation. If those who are directing the operations have only the resources (intellectual, fiscal, logistical) available in the wilds of, say, Afganistan, then “times are tough”. If, on the other hand, the “puppet masters” (with appologies to R. Heinlein) are intellectually astute and well-heeled, with training in biotechnology, then the manufacuture of, say, AttackVirus “X”, might be no-big-deal. Perhaps even snuck in between real production work as a digital signal is snuck in between the analog signals on a telephone line. In Newark, say. Or Trenton. All they need to do to actually deliver the stuff is find a contact to some rabid, Jihad-loving Muslims (of which there is no shortage), and . . . . 