How many more attacks before the West has to consider the previously unthinkable?

Dunno; why don’t you try writing something rational. Try writing again, real slow-like.

Or, better yet, keep your promise and stroll away, whether in a huff, a snit, or just a hissy, get ye gone. Nothing in your presence here would become you like the leaving of it. Y’aint wanted here, boy. (Cute as a bug, but a tad d.i.m. I keep pitchin’ ‘em and he keeps missin’ ‘em.) Is that a rabbit in our pockets, or are we just happy to see you go? Your mama’s a-callin’, and she’s in Zanzibar. (What did Zanzibar ever do to deserve it?) Bugger off, laddie, and take your tongue with ye.

There was no such promise. :rolleyes:

I’m going to try to explain it to you one more time, very simply. “Good day, sir!” does not mean “I am leaving”. It is a more polite (and, in modern parlance, tongue-in-cheek) way of saying “fuck off”. That’s it. That’s all it means.

Good day, sir!

May you have a rotten day; may your aquarium cloud up with algae; may your Rottweiler flunk his obedience classes; my your hair-stylist inform you that nostril hairs do not make a moustache; may you fall madly in love with a can of pea soup.

Bad day to you, sir, I said bad day.

And while we’re on the subject, you’re a rotten cook as well.

That’s okay–there are too many cooks anyhow.

Some years ago I made a list of milestones on the road to banning. I can’t find it at the moment but, to the extent I can recall it, after “extensive quibbling with the Mods over Warnings received” came “repeated insistence that the poster was smarter/more informed/more free-thinking than his opponents and that they were all stupid/jealous/sheeple”, followed by “escalation of the sort of behavior that earned the previous Warnings” and eventually “death by Mod”.

I’d intended for the list to pertain to newbies who turn up with the intent to enlighten the rest of us with their brilliance only to discover that they picked the wrong goddamn [del]rec room[/del] messageboard to try this technique on, but every so often a longstanding poster chooses to walk that path as well.

Look ye to the skies, O ye people; the shadow of the Hammer lies ever upon us all.

Is this it?

Maybe, although I thought there was an earlier more generic version. Or maybe I’m just imagining it. It’s not a big deal.

A categorical syllogism. There must be a major term, a minor term, and a middle term. A term is a noun or phrase that can stand as the subject of a categorical proposition. You don’t even know this much, despite your desperate Googling to save face. Just give it up. Office hours are over.

P.S. Let me help you out: categorical means Aristotelian.

OK, off to teach actual logic students.

And what is the exact difference, in terms of a well-formed-formula, between “All men excrete” and “All men are members of a category that includes individuals which excrete?”

The category is grammatically the same as the verb.

You’re being obtuse (and angular.) And you merely hand-wave away the cite I posted, which was the Encyclopedia Britannica, with an example of a syllogism involving “All men breathe.” If it’s good enough for them, it ought to be good enough for you…or at least have enough weight for you to address, instead of running away and hiding from it.

If your teaching is on par with your posting here, your students are getting a sub-standard education.

ETA: I asked you for a cite for your claim that syllogisms must contain statements regarding categories; you didn’t bother answering. Is that a real rule, or did you just pull it out of your shitter?

FWIW, I agree that this seems unnecessarily picky.

I have a question. Would it be fair to say that you’re a member of this society **not **due to a desire to have evidence of your intelligence? That is, some of the membership benefits, like the journal I see they provide for your money, or something along those lines, is the purpose behind your membership?

Absolutely. The main benefit I joined for was to have access to the various groups, on Facebook and email, that allow me to engage in discussions with other members. (And one day, if there is ever one close enough and I can afford it, I might go to one of the in-person meetups.). The same basic reason I like the SDMB: to be able to interact with other smart people.

So why don’t you arrange with the other members to move your discussions to a free site? Then you’d get that benefit with no cost.

Never mind that it would be kind of a free rider dick move, it would also mean no new blood at a time when TNS membership is growing rapidly. $10 a year is a very small price to pay.

A simple solution to that second point is if one member continues to pay their dues, to which the ex-members contribute, so we’re talking a vanishingly small amount per ex-member. That way you still get access to the new blood. $10 is a very small price to pay, but you can get it down to much, much less than that.

That’s clever, but I don’t even believe in torrentng media content like TV, movies, or music. I pay for my Apple Music and Netflix subscriptions.

In the words of Stephen Hawking, “People who boast about their IQ are losers.”

People who don’t update their voices from Speak N Spell are the real losers.

I absolutely don’t believe this comment deserves a warning, and obviously I agree with its sentiment:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=19508440&postcount=287

But it sure looks to me like its not causing even a “cleared throat” is an illustration of the double standard I’ve been talking about.