Actual newspapers, not websites. I am curious as to how we compare to the public at large when it comes to perusing printed news.
I read two on a regular basis-The Oregonian, and The New York Times.
Zero.
Zero.
nm. I read the question wrong.
Zero.
1 1/2. The national edition of the New York Times weekdays and the pitiful remnant of the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle.
Can you clarify? (Edit: this is a reply to the OP because a reply link doesn’t show up)
Do you mean:
- Paper copies
- Digital copies of the actual newspapers
- News articles on the newspaper website
- News articles on news aggregators
I read the NYT on its dedicated app and when individual articles that appear on Google News.
I read the Chicago Trib on a digital version of the newspaper itself and when individual articles appear on Google News
I read paper versions of the New Yorker.
Paper copies.
So not essentially digital scans of the same paper newspapers? That’s what the Trib is-
Zero.
But what I don’t read on dead tree, my mother gladly makes up with reading five papers per week.
Zero. And I used to subscribe (and read) to both an morning and afternoon paper.
Nope-just the paper copies.
Zero. I pay to get an e-copy of the NYT and my tiny hometown paper.
The only paper news publication I pay to get any more is The Week.
Zero.
I used to be a daily reader of the local paper, and a weekly reader of The Economist (probably not quite what you meant, but it refers to itself as a newspaper). And I still am, in e-formats. But it’s been years since I’ve read any news in literal print.
Zero…
1 - Chicago Tribune. But quality has been slipping horribly, and I just heard my good friend and several of my fave writers took buyouts so, after tomorrow - 0. 
One: the Chicago Tribune, to which I’ve had a dead-tree subscription since the early '90s. But, I find that I don’t read it every day anymore, and, as @Dinsdale1 notes, the quality of the paper has declined a lot, so I’m on the verge of cancelling my subscription, or at least going to digital-only.
I also have digital subscriptions to a few other papers (Washington Post, Green Bay Press-Gazette), but those have always been solely digital.
None. I read the local paper on-line during the week.
But I have a delivery subscription to the Sunday paper and I read that Sunday mornings.
Ok, I’m not here to fight the OP. I’m just curious as to why that’s a critical distinction.
I can understand distinguishing between articles on apps or aggregators, but I’m reading a version that is exactly the same as the printed version in layout, colors, fonts etc. If I printed it out, it’d look almost the same. FWIW, it’s the same as reading the paper to me, whereas reading linked individual articles is very different.