I lived in astoria under a train trestle, in queens, and it was a very nice area, mainly greek. A three-bedroom was $2100/mo.
In terms of Carrie’s apartment, the idea that she lives alone in a brownstone, on the UWS, and hemmorhages money on shoes, clothes and taxis, is completely unreal.
That being said, I live in a true studio, much smaller than carrie’s (no alcoves here!) on the UES and I pay $1500/mo. I also don’t live in a brownstone, and I live on the avenue, not the street, which makes it cheaper. The UWS is more expensive than where I am on the UES, and apartments are also harder to find, so I imagine hers, today, would be worth $2k/month at LEAST. Dunno what prices would be 10 years ago.
Also, most rent-controlled places are large apartment buildings in specific areas of the city. It’s odd to find one brownstone on the street that just happens to be rent controlled. A majority of people in rent controlled buildings, from what I understand, have had them for years and years- lots of old people/families who hand them down to their children. Once you get a rent controlled place, you never give it up.
That also being said, most rent controlled places are not NEARLY in as nice condition as carrie’s is. When the landlord can’t make money off of making renovations, there’s no impetus to improve the place. A lot of them have outdated fixtures, no modern appliances, etc.
So for her to be able to a) find a rent controlled building on the UWS that’s b) a beautiful brownstone and c) with modern fixtures and very nice, and that d) she can afford freelancing and wasting most of her income is VERY LOW ODDS indeed. But did we ever argue that it wasn’t?