Ah, the ELCA, probably the most liberal of the main Christian denominations.
It’s the church I grew up with, and the church my parents left because it was too liberal. They still blame the ELCA’s lax standards for my atheism. Well, my mother does, my father now knows the answer, whichever way it may be.
So, when Pastor Long is saying that others are making decisions based on their demonic possession, and that is why they are supporting trans rights, would pulling that press release out, reading it, and asking him if he also thinks that Rev. Elizabeth A. Eaton is possessed would have any affect?
Personally, I would hope it would cause Long to attack the ELCA, which would demonstrate the differences between Christian beliefs, and hopefully get some of the pew sitters to join the cause.
But, while it’s great that the ELCA supports many liberal causes, it still doesn’t call out those who work against those causes while still claiming to act in Jesus’s name. That’s what is needed to stop Christian Nationalism.
To show that those espousing hatred do not represent all Christians.
It’s more than just getting a bad name, it’s having bad things done in its name. I’m not worried about the “good” Christians being identified with the “bad” Christians. I’m worried about the “good” Christians letting the “bad” Christians do bad things out of a concern of not creating a fuss.
Earlier you seemed to take issue that I didn’t do enough to differentiate liberal denominations from far right ones. If they aren’t going to differentiate themselves, then how can anyone else?