How to tell if you're prejudiced against Blanks

[JohnBckWLD]

Let’s all hope http://www.stronghealth.com/vasectomyproject/myths.cfm helps shatter some of the myths about blanks.

[Guinastasia]

@Kimstu

Liberal: * If what describes them describes me, then our labels should be the same.*

By that reasoning, Lib, and according to your standards of judgmentalism as demonstrated in this thread, you’re bigoted against people who are bigoted against bigots. You morally judgmental spider-wannabe bigot, you.

Or something. Honestly, Lib, you’re making no sense at all to me on this one. I have seen you react so negatively when somebody, for example, makes a nasty crack about “Republicans” without any qualifiers, that I’d have thought you’d be the last person to defend offensive stereotyping and generalizations of the sort that tim’s complaining about.

Hmmm…wait until someone says the word “fundy”, then see how he reacts.

[Liberal]

@Guinastasia

Hmmm…wait until someone says the word “fundy”, then see how he reacts.

I like the fact that you are a blatant idiot, rather than being subtle about it. We are discussing bigotry, and not so-called hate speech. But I am consistent about both issues — if no one can be a bigot about blanks, then no one should be a bigot about bigots (sub for “blank”); likewise, if no one can use a pejorative term about blanks, then no one should be allowed to use a pejorative term about Christian fundamentalists (sub for “blank”). If “fundy” is out, so is “hand-stabber”. And that’s what I said before.