If it’s any consolation, my Samsung Galaxy 2 is the same.
I think the nerds who design these phones don’t go out much during the day, and never realized there was a problem.
Sunlight readable displays take a metric ass-load of power to run. High Nit displays are simply not conducive to the design or typical use of consumer mobile phones where battery life is critical.
It’s never going to happen. It’s like complaining that you can’t take your car out onto the lake to fish.
I don’t use Auto-brightness, and keep the backlight turned down to extend battery life. But if I need to use my phone in bright sunlight, I just whack up the brightness.
This is not true if the screen has no backlighting. The original game boy advance worked this way. You needed to have light shining on the screen to see it. In fact, the colors looked better in bright light.
Check your brightness settings. If you have it on Auto, it may be turned down and you won’t even realize it. I had this problem with my Galaxy untill I turned off the Auto brightness.
There is a sunlight-readable LCD display technology called transflective LCD. Basically, it is lit by both reflected ambient light and a backlight.
As this article explains, transflective displays lost out to conventional LCD because they are more expensive, and conventional (backlit) LCD looks a little better when used indoors. It’s still used in some high-end outdoor equipment (my Garmin Edge 800 cycling GPS has it), but it’s rare.
The best you can do is choose a phone that has a bright screen with good anti-reflection technology, and turn up the brightness all the way. And not use any screen protector with a textured (anti-glare) surface.
Some tablets have an extra-bright display mode (I recall my old ASUS tablet called it “Super-IPS”), but I haven’t seen that on phones.
I assume by ‘good’ you mean ‘polarized’. I love my polarized glasses, but it does make some screens just about impossible to read unless you either turn your head or the screen sideways.
Thanks for the info people. I have taken it out of the otter case & that helps but I don’t think the phone will survive very long this way. My history with slippery small things is not good. :: sigh :::
All these problems pale into insignificance compared to the LCD watch I was given as an 18th birthday present, which used to reset itself to midnight Sunday 1st December if bright sunlight fell on the display. I am still unclear as to why but have to hypothesize that under those conditions that particular LCD functioned as a photovoltaic cell.
The other (and currently popular) option to transflective is transmissive. I worked on a phone at my old company where we switch mid-stream, so I got to experience the differences first hand. You get better contrast and better blacks with fully transmissive screens.
Also, part of the problem is the weak light competing with bright reflections off the glass. But even if you shade the screen, you’ll have trouble seeing because of how bright the ambient light is constricting your pupils. You need to shade the screen and shade out peripheral light. And it wouldn’t hurt to close your eyes for 10 seconds to dilate the pupils.
Motorola Electrify with brightness set to auto, if anyone is curious. I usually have to wait a second, but then the brightness ramps up. Everything is perfectly legible from then on.
I’ve followed the “transflective display” story with interest for some time. A couple years ago I compared the transflective display on my handheld GPS to the AMOLED on my smartphone:
I always carry spectacle cleaning cloths and regularly use them on my phone, tablet and sunglasses. They go in my pockets and get washed along with my trousers/jeans. Less grease on the surfaces seems to help some.