Surely you’re not unaware of how kids are educated today? There is absolutely not respect, at all, given to the notion of reproducing within a persons branch. In fact, the disrespect is so extreme, that the mainstream media and educational systems are still trying to convince everybody there there aren’t really anything other than “superficial” genetic differences between different branches of the human race?
Who are these people to decide what is to be perceived as superficial, for every other person? That is the problem - not just a little problem, but a big, major problem - HUGE.
Multi-racialism is a branch? I thought it was a hate speech?
Do you mean Halfers, like me? Virtually every “branch” results from Halfers at some point. Mexicans are a more modern example.
’
Do I think I’m genetically superior to anyone? No. Maybe there is some disease I’m immune to that most white people would suffer from. I don’t tan as easily. And I can pick lettuce real fast.
And what exactly is wrong with that? The scientific fact is that there aren’t anything other than superficial genetic differences between races. I take it as a given – contradict me on this point if you wish, but please don’t obfuscate it – that physical differences are in fact superficial differences. If you could prove that race A has a different average IQ than race B, or a predisposition to different Myers-Briggs personality types, or any kind of significant psychological or behavioral difference, then that would not be “superficial.” Bot nobody has yet proven the existence of any such differences.
And why, exactly, should the educational process give any “respect” to “the notion or reproducing within a person’s branch”? Especially as most people will do that anyway, and you know it.
People fuck people of their own race every bloody day. It is only recently that people were able to openly do anything OTHER than that, and suddenly the world is going to fall to pieces because not everyone is racially pure?
Come on. In California, almost everyone has a little of something in them. What horrible fate awaits us?
No, I’m really interested. What damnation shall strike at California because within 50 years, everyone will be a little “ethnic?”
Theory? You suggest that Genetic Branching is a theory? You are not rational. Genetic Branching is how all genetic life exists. It’s been stated before but this is how a branch is genetically defined:
GENETIC DISTANCE: The calculation of a genetic distance between two populations gives a relative estimate of the time that has passed since the populations have existed as single cohesive units. The actual scientific use of the term “Genetic distance” involves precisely how different the DNA itself is. This website will mention genetic distance is in terms of generations of reproduction or years which goes hand in hand with Genetic difference and branching.
I doubt you are open minded enough to comprehend that. You’ll likely just go on thinking that “we’re all one” and see your role as “putting down the ignorance of me.” When, in fact, you hold the ignorance torch loud and bright. What I have to realize is that so many people hold this ignorance torch, that I absolutely must just accept that for now and focus on the people who are open minded.
Discrimination: This is a fascinating word because it can mean something very positive or very negative. Usually such words are called opposites but the word discrimination is kind of an opposite of itself.
The positive meaning is: 1. The ability to notice and value quality; the ability to appreciate good quality or taste.
The negative meaning is: 2. Treating people differently through prejudice; unfair treatment of one person or group, usually because of prejudice about race, ethnic group, age group, religion, or gender.
How does this apply to human branching? Obviously we should all discriminate when selecting partners to create children with (definition #1). Obviously we should not discriminate against people because they are of a different branch (definition #2). If a person chooses to mate within or very near their branch, they will discriminate within the branch to find the best partner. If they choose to mate with a distant branch, they will discriminate to find the best partner in that distant branch. Some people will not give genetics one thought and rather, they’ll simply discriminate among whomever happens to be in their proximity zone. If the demographics contain many distant branches living together in the same proximity zone, this type of discrimination will often lead to loving “multi-racial” (multi-branched) relationships. If the demographics contain only closely related branches, this type of discrimination will lead to loving relationships within these close branches.
Technically, if an Irish mates with a Swede, both relatively “pure” verities with heritage going back many thousands of years, this is a multi-branched relationship. But it’s all relative to genetic distance. It’s however we wish to think about it, but it’s also precisely defined. Every time a human mates, they mate with somebody that has an exact, calculable aggregate genetic distance from themselves.
That is a broad statement in evolutionary biology, hellothere. But we are supposedly discussing something much more specific: Human genetic branching. Which, I keep telling you, pretty much stopped before the dawn of civilization, and ever since then different branches have been converging, not diverging.
And you still haven’t come clost to answering the most important question, which several posters have repeated and you keep ignoring: What are the existing branches of humanity today?
I am addressing what choices a person has, not whether they specifically think about those choices while making them. You are addressing whether they thought about it prior to making the decision and your suggestion is that they “Not think about” unique human branches while making their reproductive choices. I wasn’t discussing whether people think about that or not in that section… it is in another location - that location is the next statement after item #2. So that is your item #3, already present in my website.
Yes, I saw that graph, but somehow I don’t think that’s what hellothere is talking about when he says “branches.” I mean, on the graph there’s “Europeans,” and on one side of them “Iranians,” and on the other side “Sardinians.” Is that the level of discrimination hellothere is talking about? Sardinians should be taught it’s all right to mate with other Sardinians? I don’t think so.