You would have to think about the consequences and benefits of both. The diaper would be incredibly embarassing and losing your sense of taste would make cooking food a waste of time.
I’d opt to lose my sense of taste.
I’d go with taste too… I wouldn’t want to wear a diaper adn wetting myself would be too embarrassing… at least when I don’t have tastebuds I could eat pretty much anything and be able to gross people out… I also wouldn’t have to worry about gagging over the taste (just the texture)
I would have to go with losing taste as well. Not because I’d find being incontinent embarrassing–I don’t see a lot of point to being embarrassed about what can’t be helped–but because it would be uncomfortable and inconvenient. Loss of taste wouldn’t be fun either–I like food–but it at least wouldn’t entail any special measures. And for that matter, maybe I’d like food enough less that I’d lose weight.
This one is too easy… definitely [1]. Heck, I might be eager for that to happen, given my food tastes, which are that there are very few things I actively like and lots of things I can’t stomach. Plus, I don’t much like healthy food. If I had no sense of taste at all I could just eat healthy food quickly and cheaply and get on with my life…
Loss of taste. Diapers would be so inconvient, and I haven’t seen anyone make a stylish diaper bag for adults yet. Plus, diapers cost tons of money, while losing my sense of taste could save me money since I’d only buy and eat the most sensible, nutritious and economical choices. I’d probably loose these extra 20 pounds, too.
Definitely rather lose my sense of taste. Food is no big deal, but I would hate to have to wear diapers. It’s icky. Half the time I don’t even wear underwear, so I would have to get all new clothes too.
I love food. I mean, I LOVE food. Having said that, I am also disgustingly practical. I don’t want to be sloshing around in a leaky Depends. If I am given a choice, I’d have to give up my sense of taste.