Oh, I agree. But filtering them out might itself take five minutes, meaning that by then you would already be in your final scene.
Or it might take about 30 seconds.
“Whoever wants to see the play, step over there. Whoever doesn’t, follow me to the classroom.”
But then again, now we’re debating pointless things that can’t be proven.
I don’t care much about the little nitty gritty things, only that the principal and the vice principal lied, got together and got a story to tell us (the only two complaining) and didn’t apologize. It’s simple as that.
Their reason was a lie and it hurt my girlfriend. Had they said some of the points that have come up here (some of which may actually be something that could have been a half good reason) I wouldn’t be as angry.
God damn, Lib, did I stumble into Great Debates? Why must you analyze this to death? We’re talking about seating people for a play, it’s not the Spanish fucking Inquisition*.
Hey clayton_e, how’s the 'burgh these days? I went to SUNY in the late 80s. 
*[sub]I’m now expecting the next poster to mention Monty Python
[Fred Flinstone] Fricken-fracken-frick [/Fred Flinstone].
I meant to end that with a [/sub].
You were here?! Cool!! The 'burgh is doin the same, pretty much.
Same old, I guess.
My gf is going to SUNY next year, for nursing. That place has an amazing nursing program.
What were you studying here?
Clayton_e wrote:
I don’t think they lied. I think you just don’t see the bigger picture. You’ve mentioned no one else, just you and your girlfriend. You expected that the two of you should be accomodated and that everyone else should comply — even to the extreme that they should herd together efficiently like sheep so that they could get inside fast enough to assuage your demands.
Well, look at it this way. You and your lap dogs here in this thread are postively incredulous that I am asking for even the most basic explanations. Maybe your principle and vice-principle feel the same way toward you, given that the dilemma that they had is not that hard to understand.
Nutty wrote:
Clayton set the precedent for analyzing it to death. Have someone read this part of the OP to you:
AAACKKK!!!
What the hell is wrong with you?!?!
You say:
After I say it wouldn’t be hard for them to say:
You call people lap dogs for simply saying stuff like they wish my girlfriend could have seen the play.
You personally attack me:
(and if you’re not suggesting someting or questioning my veracity what the hell are you saying?!)
You say I am the one that started the overanalyzing thing:
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!
When your following quote of mine was simply something I said in the OP to explain how I came to the conclusion they lied.
If you look at the simple fact that on the tape the bell rings at a specific time, the people were there 20 minutes before that bell rang and also the fact that none of our scenes are larger than 5 minutes you have to come to the conclusion that the reason that the principal said was a blatant lie.
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!? GO BOTHER SOMEONE ELSE!!!
You mention that your vice principal told you that your gf et al arrived at “10 of 2”. I’m not familiar with that grammatical construction, but could’nt it have meant 2:10 , or just that you misunderstood that they arrived at 10 to 2 ?
If that was the case, and as you mentioned that the 2:10 bell came 3 minutes before the end of the play, then I don’t see justification for a rant.
As you were in the play, likely not amenable to bullshit, and knowing educators generally hold their integrity among their students of extreme importance, I am somewhat reluctant to accept that they lied to you.
grienspace, by “10 to 2” I mean 1:50. They arrived at that time because I was told by several people they waited for that period of time.
This is all very confusing to me.
-
Is this a half hour play? (Starts just berfore 1:50 and ends shortly after 2:10)
-
Is this then a 4 act play performed in half an hour? (3 spaces between scenes)
-
If you were there, presumably acting, or at least observing, why did it take a subsequent tape to stir you suspicions? After all, you should have been aware at what time the play started, just before 1:50 presumably 1:45 according to your testimony as quoted above. As the vice principal already testified that the bus group arrived at 1:50, (with which you concur) are you telling us that you completely forgot that you were in or observed a 4 act play? with 3 spaces?
I wanted to be a lawyer when I was a kid.
It could well be that seating people between scenes would have been (in the VP’s judgement) disruptive. In that case, s/he should have given that as a reason, instead of lying about the breaks. I’d be pissed too; I expect a higher standard from people who purport to be authority figures.
Yes Taran, you are right. It would not have bothered me as much if he had simply had that as a reason. I would be mildly angry, but that is a totally valid reason if that was how he felt. If that is how he felt I wish he had said that.
However the facts show that he was lying when he used the reason that they arrived after the last scene had started.
Oh, Greinspace, yes, about 40 minutes or so was the total length.
And there were actually several small scenes at the very beginning (only a minute or two) that I didn’t count because they didn’t really apply to this.
I only mentioned the last few scenes and the very last scene that was larger.
I didn’t notice the time that it started because I was sitting backstage working on costume stuff when the chorus was going, so I wasn’t watching a clock. Later I was told what time it started (and yes, I looked at the tape and went backward from the time of the bell to verify it) to realize that it had started at around quarter of.
I still wish I knew why this is such a huge mystery to some people… I proved that he was lying by compairing his reason to the time that is known in the play (the bell ringing) and I worked my way backward and counted the spaces between scenes until I reached 1:50. If there was even ONE then he was lying. There was 3 (although there was a 4th that was very close). ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?!
Lib, arguing with a pissed-off teenager is like arguing with a fundie, a woman, or a libertarian (have I sufficiently offended everyone?)–you’ll never win, even if you win.
Well clayton, that really sucks. I know where you’re coming from, you just would rather have had them tell you their reasoning than to make something up that they thought would have sounded better. “We didn’t want to” being the truth, versus “We couldn’t”, so they could try and displace the blame.
Tough luck, I hope your girlfriend cools off though.
-foxy
What kind of drama queen are you dating who has to cry because she misses someone’s performance?
Marc
Marc: Perhaps a better question would be: “What kind of jerk must the boyfriend be that the girlfriend is reduced to tears for missing a high school play?”
Wha? Are you getting from clayton’s post that he’s abusive? If so, for Heaven’s sake how?
She wanted to see it, she didn’t get to see it, she was sad, she cried. No need for abuse there. Drama queen I can sorta see, though I try not to cast aspersions on people I don’t know (maybe her parents are getting divorced, maybe she’s chronically depressed, maybe she’s a weepy queen. How the hell would we know?)
Seriously, I don’t understand this at all. Where’s the hostility coming from?
School’s out already? Let the fun begin. :rolleyes:
Clayton, Clayton, Clayton. It’s obvious you’ve never been to a performance. If you miss the opening curtain, you have to wait for a suitable break before the usher will let you in. In some cases, that may very well be intermission. If you miss the curtain after intermission, you again have to wait for a break in the play. This may be the closing curtain. Depends on the program. And if you’re so late that you’ve missed most of it, you probably won’t get in at all.
Has to do with manners, see. It’s VERY distracting to the performers to have people coming and going, and a large group coming in at the end is certainly a distraction.
Look, I know that you’re hurt and angry that your girlfriend was not able to see you in the play. However, there were other factors here. What you thought to be a break between scenes probably wasn’t. And, as you mentioned, the end-of-school bell was to ring at 2:10 and, in fact, rang before the play was over. The administration probably didn’t want to a) disrupt the play, and b) go much past the closing bell.
Chalk it up to bad timing, buck up and get over it.
Robin