Some thoughts for a future policy (which I think you need, just for clarity’s sake), taken from the way “adelantos” are set in the Spanish General Labor Law. This law applies to every worker and sector; then each sector and those companies that are big enough may have more-specific “convenios” but I’ve never seen one that modified the “adelantos”. So it’s something that’s been working for a whole country for more than 80 years.
- Cap, set up as “$XXXX or Y% of employee’s yearly salary, whichever is smaller.” This is actually intended as a protection for the employee, to keep people from digging themselves in.
- Cap can be raised (to other levels that must be set by the company) on Finance’s approval. This is intended for things like “a truck without brakes struck my house, we’re all alive although shaken but it will be a while until insurance comes through.” In cases like that one, what some companies do is pick the bill directly (which counts as a business expense) rather than give the money to the worker, the worker repays it long-term.
- Repayment as “$XXX or %Z of the loan, whichever is larger but up to M% of the worker’s salary.” This is intended to get the money back where it belongs as fast as possible without leaving the worker on PBJ sandwiches.
$4000, paid back on $100 installments, is over 3 years! So definitely if you loan it to him the payment has to be bigger than that.
I am going to give him the loan and word it very similiar to your statements. I refuse to be forced to do a policy on this. I think I should be able to help and use my discretion as to when and how much. I do not want to embarrass him but I do want him to walk away knowing that I don’t feel good about this loan and it will be the last one. (Perhaps offering up that other people should have a chance to take advantage of a loan during their hardships.)