If you know me, you know I won’t argue that last part. It was funny.
Not really. It wasn’t just that Waverly didn’t like the “I can has” form, he put it in his thread title right before bitching about people who put it in thread titles.
I think it’s a legitimate question, at the very least.
Sure. And it has a legitimate answer: it’s called “mockery.”
Yeah. So people would know what he was talking about.
Next legitimate question? Oh, right. Well, when a mummy loves a daddy very much…
You’ve got it backwards. The OP was the one saying (something like) “if you like it so much, why don’t you marry it” in response to those “moron-speaking”.
The thread could just have as easily been titled “I hate LOLcatz-speak” and it would have been just as easily understood. And less a lot of hypocritical.
Except only the people who knew exactly what lolcats sound like would come in. This way everybody who’s been annoyed by can has’ing gets in on the fun.
But really I’m just replying so that you get a response and don’t go away thinking we all agree with you. In fact, we all secretly hate your guts and I drew the short straw and had to be the one to respond. Oh, woe is me! 
That’s a desperate fight for a point you are not keeping track of.
You know what they say: it’s not the size of the dog in the fight, it’s how big your penis is.
I thought it was, “If you get into a fight with a dog, don’t let him bite your penis.”
You don’t fool me. Since the LOLcat has been let out the bag in this thread, I realize this is a thinly disguised attempt to cover the fact that I am right by responding and pretending that you really don’t want to.
