On the other hand, I didn’t vote against charter schools.
I don’t have kids. I’m never going to have kids. While I do care what’s best for the state and for the country, I did not educate myself on this issue and so did not mark my ballot either way. (I did vote to legalise marijuana, though I have some reservations about abuse and enforcement. But if alcohol is legal, I see no reason for weed to be illegal.)
So. Is this thread ‘Educate Johnny as to why charter schools should be allowed in this state or not allowed in this state’? Or is it ‘I, Doper, didn’t vote on x, and this is why.’? I guess we’ll see how it turns out.
Thanks. And these were state ballot amendments, California-style?
I’ll add $.02 that voting NO on a proposition is not a bad default position, especially if you’re amending a state constitution. When I vote on CA ballot amendments, each one has to overcome my strong “I vote NO on most amendments” filter when I review it.
I don’t vote No on initiatives I haven’t researched. It might be a good thing, and by voting No I may help to stop a good thing. Of course it may also be a bad thing, and not voting against it might allow it to pass. So I only vote on the issues on which I am informed.
Generally charter schools are privately run schools that are regulated by the local school district. They get all their funding from the school district, they cannot charge students extra to attend their school over a public school.
It provides students with an alternative to their district public school. Obama supports them.
This is to be contrasted with voucher systems which have no redeeming qualities over charter schools.