I don't believe those tears - not for a second

[Lobohan]

@mhashi22

No one has to do anything in an effort to make Obama look bad; he can do that all on his own.

Look, dude, I appreciate your fucking limp attempt to stand up for what you think is happening here, but the fact of the matter is your stance on the Benghazi incident has been dismantled like the Monty Python Black Knight.

Your position is based on you being gullible enough to believe the lies being told to you by the same people who lied to you about the poll numbers.

Take the hook out of your mouth, actually address how your beliefs are based on misinformation and grow the fuck up and walk like an adult. You’re too old to live in a world based on wishing.

[mhashi22]

@Hentor_the_Barbarian

I think I’ve paid closer attention than you. Your level of attention appears to be cutting and pasting excised quotes that other people say is meaningful without reading it yoirself.

The administration has always qualified their statements to indicate that the investigation was ongoing and the information they had was their best guess at the time.

I linked to the full transcript of a couple of these in another thread. You should check them out.

Your first reference to the WaPo concurs with Reuters that the administration was wholly unprepared for the 9-11 attacks. Furthermore, they conclude that they went into spin mode with a “…tangle of contradictions.”

This doesn’t support your case at all.

Your second link is no more forgiving than the first and pokes at the president’s response to Ladka as “canned,” “bureaucratic,” and evasive.

What point are you trying to make with your post? You seem to be trying to tear down my points with articles that support me.

[zoid]

@mhashi22

No one has to do anything in an effort to make Obama look bad; he can do that all on his own.

You are factually incorrect.
You know you are factually incorrect as has been pointed out by other posters with valid citations.
Despite this you continue to put forth factually incorrect statements.

This makes you a liar, a dishonest piece of shit, a partisan shill, and piss poor excuse for a human being.

[elucidator]

And you should feel bad!

[zoid]

@elucidator

And you should feel bad!

Hey now! I was trying not to get personal.

[mhashi22]

@Lobohan

Look, dude, I appreciate your fucking limp attempt to stand up for what you think is happening here, but the fact of the matter is your stance on the Benghazi incident has been dismantled like the Monty Python Black Knight.

Your position is based on you being gullible enough to believe the lies being told to you by the same people who lied to you about the poll numbers.

Take the hook out of your mouth, actually address how your beliefs are based on misinformation and grow the fuck up and walk like an adult. You’re too old to live in a world based on wishing.

At this point there is still an active Congressional investigation. Don’t you think you’re being premature in calling the debate over on Benghazi? No, dude. It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.

You believe your lies and I’ll believe mine.

[running_coach]

@mhashi22

At this point there is still an active Congressional investigation. Don’t you think you’re being premature in calling the debate over on Benghazi? No, dude. It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.

You believe your lies and I’ll believe mine.

At least you admit they’re lies.
McCain skipped a briefing on Benghazi to complain about the lack of information. Something tells me he’s not really upset about the incident.

[mhashi22]

@zoid

You are factually incorrect.
You know you are factually incorrect as has been pointed out by other posters with valid citations.
Despite this you continue to put forth factually incorrect statements.

This makes you a liar, a dishonest piece of shit, a partisan shill, and piss poor excuse for a human being.

You have 4,777 posts. Are any of them informative and intelligent or all they all just trashy pukes of foul language with no valid points?

[The_Dord]

@mhashi22

You have 4,777 posts. Are any of them informative and intelligent or all they all just trashy pukes of foul language with no valid points?

You have 20 posts. Are any of them informative and intelligent or all they all just trashy pukes of foul language with no valid points?

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

@mhashi22

Your first reference to the WaPo concurs with Reuters that the administration was wholly unprepared for the 9-11 attacks. Furthermore, they conclude that they went into spin mode with a “…tangle of contradictions.”

This doesn’t support your case at all.

Your second link is no more forgiving than the first and pokes at the president’s response to Ladka as “canned,” “bureaucratic,” and evasive.

What point are you trying to make with your post? You seem to be trying to tear down my points with articles that support me.

What the fuck are you talking about? I linked to two transcripts to give the unclipped context of two of the quotes- one from Obama and one from Rice.

My case is to illustrate exactly what they said. I have no idea what your talking about, and I’m getting the strong sense you don’t either.

[mhashi22]

@runner pat

At least you admit they’re lies.
McCain skipped a briefing on Benghazi to complain about the lack of information. Something tells me he’s not really upset about the incident.

No, I don’t mean that my information are lies. I simply mean that you consider my information lies and I consider yours to be lies. Make sense? It’s not being deceptive. That would spoil the discussion.

[pseudotriton_ruber_ruber]

@mhashi22

No, I don’t mean that my information are lies. I simply mean that you consider my information lies and I consider yours to be lies. Make sense? It’s not being deceptive. That would spoil the discussion.

You are arguing with the skill, logic and vehemence of Senators McCain and Graham but without the authority of a US senator’s office.

Which is to say, you’re making an idiot out of yourself by making baseless charges that don’t stand up to the most superficial level of scrutiny, and you’re making it worse by repeating your contentions instead of elaborating on them.

[BrainGlutton]

@mhashi22

No, I don’t mean that my information are lies. I simply mean that you consider my information lies and I consider yours to be lies. Make sense? It’s not being deceptive. That would spoil the discussion.

You have not even that excuse any more. You’ve been shown the truth, had your nose rubbed in it, since this thread started. You are simply a liar now.