Sneak brag.
Or professionalism.
Yeah, normally I’m pretty hippy-dippy liberal, but there must be some lurking 1%-enabling, Puritan-work-ethic conservative in me, because I’m very puzzled by the idea that this guy deserves compassion above all else from his management structure. He deserves a paycheck in exchange for providing work. If he’s providing embarrassment to the company by offending customers of all the call-takers on the floor, and moreover tells his third-removed boss to fuck off, he’s lucky he still has a job. Especially in a market where there are probably dozens of qualified people who’d love to take over for him and wouldn’t dream of doing either unsavory behavior.
Only if “professionalism” is being used as a moral concept.
Let’s make sure the intellectual landscape is clear here. I believe there is only one poster on this thread who has made an issue about compassion. Other posters (including me) have said it may be a bad business decision to fire this guy based on this incident, depending on the circumstances.
It would be a bad boss who fires someone because they are lucky they have a job.
I don’t know about that; I think FMF would have been handled in a very similar fashion at most of the companies I have worked for (including a referral to the company counselling plan to help get your shit sorted out). Having serious personal issues would get you some compassion, but it’s not a Get Out of Jail Free card - other employees and the business would still be considered. For example, an employee just lost a child/parent/spouse and are behaving very badly at work - they’d be taken aside and told to go home for the day and take as long as they need to pull it together, but they wouldn’t be allowed to stay at work and disrupt everyone else.