True. You’re not the least bit likeable.
That’s not a bad response from you, have to give you a point there. You’re making progress.
Then what is it that you are laughing at? That liberals are concerned about the future of our country? That liberals are concerned for the future of many of the more vulnerable citizens and residents of our country? That liberals are concerned about how ignoring the environment may come and bite us in the ass?
I mean, there are two types of liberals that are funny, comedians, and people that are futilely trying to protect the country, its people and its environment from the damage being done by conservatives. You said that you aren’t laughing at the first, so, what does that leave us?
When Democrats were in charge, I never laughed at conservatives for trying to prevent the ACA from being passed. I disagreed with them, and fought against them, but I didn’t laugh at them because I was making the things that they were striving for out of reach.
If you want people to not think that “laugh at liberals” is not you getting schadenfreudian pleasure out of the pain and dismay that liberals are feeling due to the damages that are being done to the fabric of our society, then articulate what it is about liberals you find so damn funny.
While I think HD is mostly a troll, I’ll defend F-P a bit – I sometimes find him obnoxious and pedantic in political threads, but he took the time to provide some thoughtful and useful information in threads I started about finding a new HVAC unit and on real estate investment. I think he’s a good contributor to the board, in general.
Just for the record, I wasn’t offering to do it for you. You’ll have to find it and figure out how to work it all on your own. If you have problems, try this site:
conservativestickuptheass.com.
If the above link doesn’t work, take the stick out of your ass and try again.
Or I could just watch your webcam …
You wanna see my scrotum pole huh? You’d never feel like a man again if you did.
Recently I learned, via HurricaneDitka himself, that this murder of 168 people was not entirely unreasonable. Certainly not to be compared with the heinousness of the Antifa terrorists who tossed stones, unreasonably, toward Nazis — Nazis merely exercising their God-given First Amendment right to complain that Jews, Muslims and blacks are not yet entirely dead.
Would I be out-of-line to suggest that Mr. Ditka’s opinions are not entirely humane? And that his supporters do not appear to be entirely sane and/or sober?
How can you make the McVeigh argument without also acknowledging that 9/11 was a reasonable response to U.S. excursions into the Middle East?
Because brown people?
Killing civilians in response to actions taken by a government is terrorism.
If Mcveigh’s terrorism is reasonable, then all terrorism is.
FTR, I do not subscribe to that idea.
Also, anyone who holds this idea certainly cannot consider peaceful, if inconvenient, protests to be unreasonable responses to government actions. And even if a protest escalates to violence and rioting, that is still a reasonable response.
I dunno, has HD ever criticized BLM or any other protest group for anything? If not, then at least hypocrisy in this is not added to the wright of sins.
Anita are “terrible people - advocating and effecting violence against their political opponents.”
I wouldn’t disagree with that. But then, I’d disagree with that heinous statement about McVeigh.
Aw, Anita’s not so bad.
He seems to have a bug up his ass about antifa. I guess those guys oppose facism. The nerve, huh? They do it with aggressive confrontation against peaceful nazis from what I’ve seen in HD’s antifa links. Otherwise, I’d never have heard of them.
I Pit HurricaneDitka for wasting my time. Although typical right-wing arrogance has been the dominant theme of his contributions here, from time to time, he exhibited actual intelligence and intellectual curiosity — or so I thought. In another thread, he claimed that Hillary and Trump were equivalent liars — both “typical politicians.” Was he aware of Trump U.? No, he openly bragged, it’s not important.
I wasted time to engage him, and posted a summary of Trump U., a massive detestable fraud for which Trump has been forced to pay out tens of millions. Hurricane’s response was, in effect: “Just what I said; Trump’s a fraudster, Hillary exaggerated about sniper fire. Same-same. Trump has been charged with child rape; Hillary is alleged to have run the child sex ring from a pizza parlor. Same-same.”
We’re left with the question: How can a man exhibit this much stupidity and be both sincere and intelligent? Is the right-wing echo chamber so strong as to rob a man completely of his mental faculties? Hurricane writes like he has at least a 95+ IQ; what gives? Is he a troll? Does he work for the Russians? It seems far-fetched, but how else to explain his mental model? Even Starving Artist and Brickhead seem to understand how detestable a man Trump is.
For once, I’m not being sarcastic. I sincerely wonder what his game or mental model is. He doesn’t seem like a “troll,” but I have no other explanation.
Skilled stealth troll, I think. Mixed with a little bit of actual desire for discussion, and a lot of general dishonesty.
HurricaneDitka’s greater sin in my eyes is that he’s yet another poltroon who avoids the Pit to insulate his delicate constitution from the consequences of his own tireless shitbaggery, under the guise of religiosity or decorum or preference for real, “productive” debate over mindless mud-slinging. Meanwhile he’s willing and able to say things just as vile as anything uttered here, as long as he frames it in phony golly-jeepers-I’m-only-asking-what-you-guys-think language and leaves out the fucks and cunts.
Anita way to quit being tripped up by spellcheck! 
Well, you could just turn it off.
I put them in my response. Then delete before posting.