It is so pathetic, that it’s difficult to accept it’s serious.
Any other human subjected to the level of scrutiny that Hill-Dawg has been subjected to would be found wanting. She didn’t break any laws. She didn’t do anything wrong. Just because a lot of lying scumbags on the right, and a lot of gullible, passionate Sanders supporters on the left, retweet a bunch of the same nonsense, fact-deprived polemics, doesn’t make them true.
SHe didn’t actually comply with the law fully, but it often takes more than that to secure an indictment. She’s already claiming she “lost” emails that Abedin had. That’s a violation of recordskeeping laws, but probably not worth indicting her over because you can’t prove that it was done with intent to break the law.
But if you want to assume incompetence, that’s fine too.
Specifically. In detail, please. Present your evidence. What indictment are they right on the border of?
It’s a production error. When you search and copy 50k emails, sometimes one gets lost in the shuffle. No one in their right mind would call that a violation of law.
It’s not incompetence for one email to go missing or be deleted by accident. Especially when another copy of it exists on your assistant’s computer files.
She did not actually turn over all work emails. And the ones she didn’t turn over just happened, by pure coincidence, to be slightly embarrassing.
I think it’s pretty obvious that email wasn’t intended to ever be made public. I think most of the public draws similar conclusions. She was being shady.
She simply wanted to control what the public saw.
Her statement was that she directed them to be turned over. If the techs who sifted them missed one, how is that a crime on her part?
Well, if someone who hates Hillary with a passion finds it obvious, I suppose I don’t need to see any evidence.
“Disqualified” is silly nonsense. Plenty of people don’t like Hillary but are happy to vote for her.
The going-around is the coming-around. Twenty years of intense scrutiny have made Hillary a functional paranoid, the kind that isn’t crazy and has real enemies eager to exploit anything they can get their hands on. Even if they can’t. She not only had to review her options in terms of what a reasonable person might think, but in terms of what a raving loon might think.
If your Mom or my Mom had been subjected to the same treatment, we would be opening an internet post telling us that she was the Whore of Babylon with full color photos of the Cups of Her Fornications. Not mine, I’m real sure. Maybe yours, but I doubt it.
Next up, the GOP Benghazi report. Any bets who it will blame directly?
I would bet Hillary but I would probably have to lay down $500 to earn $1, and with my luck today they would probably blame Obama. 
500 to 1? Well, let me think. Put down a hundred, Trump wins, maybe enough money to buy some property in Canada. I hear it makes it easier. Only about four hours from the border, can probably get across before the Canadians close it. Start building their Wall…
Well, $100 down at 500:1 odds still is only $50k. I don’t know how much land $50k in suddenly devalued American currency will get you in Canada, but you may wish to hedge your bet by an order of magnitude. 
So you’re saying she didn’t have the ambassador killed like Vince Foster after all? 
We’re not laughing at you, we’re laughing *with *you. You *are *laughing, aren’t you? No? Uh oh.
First, a ‘tech’ didn’t sift through her email. Clintons lawyers did. At least understand what happened before the knee-jerk dismissal.
Second, it is Clintons responsibility to turn over the emails. Period. Had she used authorized systems we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Since she didn’t use the State systems, it is her responsibility to ensure all emails are turned over, regardless of who she picked to sort the emails.
Slee
And there it is.
And after all the accusations of being wrong (also in the Benghazi “scandal”) and that one should not trust those outfits like Talking Points Memo, MediaMatters, Slate or Salon it turns out that most of the experts they consulted were correct.
Of course the record elsewere will show that, as usual, the ones using right wing media sources will either forget that they were had when the “experts” they consulted or the talking heads told then that Hillary should go to prision for this; or those consumers of misinformation will never bother to demand better from outfits like FOX, Breitbart, Drudge, World [del]nut[/del] Net Daily and many others that misguided them and will continue to do so.
No need for quotes around scandal. Comey said she was extremely careless in handling classified information. Things turned out exactly as I expected: no charges, but a pretty scathing statement from yet another impartial source.
So, Addy, was it, or was it not, a scandal when Powell and Rice both did the same thing?
No, it was not. Neither set up a private server to evade FOIA requirements, and neither lied about what they had done after the fact. Clinton has only revealed things as they’ve been found out. CAll it the Blue Dress Doctrine: never admit anything until it’s already discovered.
Only a scandal when it’s a Clinton is the lesson here.