I just sent an email to James Randi!

In response to today’s Commentary:

http://www.randi.org/jr/102601.html

I sent this email.

(Note, for those who don’t want to read the commentary, it discusses the so-called “Sheep and Goats Effect” which is the name of the effect, according to psychic researchers, that prevents psychic powers from functioning optimally when there are skeptics present, due to ‘negative vibrations’. It also mentions David Copperfield performing a psychic feat in which he was revealed to have chosen the winning numbers in a lottery after they had been selected, and how he can’t use this power for himself, or else it will fail to function.

The letter:


Mr. Randi,
How unprofessional of you to dismiss the Sheep and Goats effect. This is not any claptrap, this is genuine phenomena. It is a scientifically determined fact that lack of belief inhibits reactions. If you have twenty skeptics in a room during a psychic demonstration, the demonstration is likely to go awry. If you have twenty skeptics in a room with water cooled to 32 degrees Fahrenheit in it, the water won’t freeze, due to the negative vibrations. Light, as you know, fails to travel at 186,000 mps in a vacuum if enough people believe it won’t.
Psychic abilities follow the exact same laws of nature as any other natural, scientifically explorable phenomenon. This is why, if enough people in the room believe otherwise, salt will not be composed of Sodium and Chlorine, and a hydrogen atom will fail to have one electron. Like psychics and winning lottery numbers, it’s a fact that a chemist is unable to concoct any type of pharmaceutical mixture that he personally will benefit from. (In fact, for optimum chemistry, the mixture should be prepared, hidden until it is no longer needed, and only then revealed to be the ideal solution.)
You and other skeptics constantly slam the so-called unprofessionalism of psychics while failing to point out how often articles in Nature read like this: “I’m seeing a compound…there’s definitely a Carbon molecule in it…what does ‘N’ mean to you? I see a covalent bond - do you understand?”
Psychic phenomenon is a natural phenomenon and as such follows the exact same behavior as other natural phenomenon. There’s no reason it shouldn’t be subject to the exact same Sheep and Goats Effect that plagues all other scientific research. You need to stop holding it to a different standard.


I’m so damn clever!

I once e mailed James Randi. Todl him I was a christian, and he actually e-mailed me back asking if I beleived in the tooth fairy and easter bunny too!!

I was watching a special on TLC or Discovery about this sort of thing.

Two researchers, one in California and one in Germany devised a test based on the ‘somebody is watching me’ sensation that most people will claim to have from time to time. They placed a subject in a room with a video camera pointed at them. They were attached to a group of stress level detectors and asked to relax and read a newspaper for a period of 15 mins. Then during that time someone would watch them over the video camera and the researchers would see if there was any correlation between being watched and the stress level of the subject. (in theory the ability to sense when you were being watched would be helpful in a evolutionary way)

The German researcher did not find any correlation but the one in California did. So they did it again and both got the same results as before. So the California researcher went to Germany and got the same results she did in California. So the German guy went to California and got the same (negetive) results.

Their conclusion was that they, the researchers themselves, were affecting the outcome of the expierement. The German researcher did not believe his subjects would be able to sense when being watched and they couldn’t. The California researcher believed that her subjects could do it and they did.
Sorry I don’t have a link to send you off to this but I thought I’d pass this story along.

Well, do you, vanilla?

Legomancer, you rock. You are indeed, damn clever.

No, though I did when little.