Cops can’t make you do a field sobriety test. They CAN make you exit your car.
So open the passenger door and make the driver crawl over the seats to exit. Not rock solid but it could help build a case.
While I have you here, I have a less pedantic question. Let’s say an officer Mirandizes a suspect before taking them downtown. The suspect says he wants a lawyer and has nothing to say…so the officers rather then taking him downtown, takes him to the scene of the crime where any number of things may happen. An investigation may still be going on. A body could still be onsite.
The Q: Could the prosecution use the suspects reaction to the crime scene against him?
I’m now wondering if there is any law against the cops taking an arrested suspect to play mini-golf for a few hours before going downtown. It seems like the least they could do under the circumstances.
it might show some signs of drunkenness, I s’pose.
But it would be tough to prove in court. I’m a healthy, skinny guy, and I can only barely maneuver and twist my body to get out of the drivers seat, over the console and stick shift, and crawl across the passenger seat to exit the car.*
But now I have a serious question for you lawyers out there: how do drunkenness and Miranda rights mix?
1.The cop arrests you for drunk driving, with good proof from the breathylizer test. So, by law, you are drunk, and incapable of making decisions.
2. Then the cop reads you your Miranda rights, and asks if you understand them.
3. But you’re drunk!!! You can’t understand anything. You can’t make use of your rights
So how can the phrase “anything you say be used against you in a court of law” hold up?
–
*( yes, the driver-side door latch was broken, and my muscles were sore for three days, till I got it fixed)
Cops don’t have to read Miranda unless they are conducting an interrogation after an arrest. So if they felt the need to, they would wait until the perp sobered up in a cell, and then Miranda them.
I’m not sure a drunk person crawling out the passenger side is going to look very much different than a sober person crawling out the passenger side.
I mean, it’s crawling. As in down on all fours, the easiest possible way to balance yourself. Seems kinda useless (unless you go the evil route and testify “Look, this idiot driver was so wasted that he exited the passenger door.”
No, they can’t, but in Illinois (and maybe other states), refusal of a sobriety test is considered an admission of guilt and will result in the court rendering a verdict of guilty.
Just an opinion from an “armchair lawyer”, but I think it would be totally unacceptable in court because the defendant was not allowed access to a lawyer before they started playing games with him.
Surely you’d have to establish that I could crawl out the passenger side door without puking on the cops’ shoes while sober before this could be used to prove I’m drunk?