There is nothing, nothing at all, that is more painful than listening to professional athletes doing an interview. I can live with the cliches, I can live with the fact that they have learned how to say absolutely nothing while making people think that they said something, I can even live with the fact that most of these guys are dumber than a bag of hammers and likely have trouble signing their names.
What I cannot take, though, is the way they talk when they get in front of a microphone.
Interviewer: So, Snerdley, how do you think the team will do this year?
Snerdley: Well, you know, it’s like, you know, we have some great players, I mean, you know, it’s like we’ve got all our guys back, you know, like, from last year, you know, and it’s like we’ll be, you know, just as good as last year. You know what I mean?
All that just to say that the same players are coming back and they’re great players. Not that any player would dare disparage his teammates unless he wanted to get traded, because that just isn’t done. So it took our example 30 seconds to spit out absolutely nothing, not even answering the question he was asked. And this sort of thing is typically considered to be a good interview.
Why do we listen to this? What is the fascination with hearing an athlete talk? The host is almost universally more articulate. I’d much rather hear him talk. At least he’s will to hang it out and say something controversial. If I could trust an athlete to say something shocking it might be worth my time to hear him struggle with 2nd grade English, but since he won’t he should just shut up on the principle that it is far better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it.