Hope he did not slip and fall in the water on the pool deck.
Its the policy position of the aap to ban assault weapons. Would you like me to google that for you?
[Quotd]2) How can you be sure the pediatrician doesn’t ask about guns of patients that she thinks are likely to have guns, and pools in patients that she thinks have pools?
and a followup question:
2a) Do you, Damuri Ajashi, have a pool*? 'Cause if you don’t, then I’m thinking your pediatrician asked the appropriate question of the appropriate patient, and then you went off your head about it.
- I don’t recall you having mentioned having a pool. If you have answered this, my apologies, and my thanks for re-answering it
[/QUOTE]
Yes I have a pool.
Must be nice. And you have a gun.
Oooh, that was fucking snarky. Especially since these gun threads have taught me to be careful about terminology. The AAP wants to ban so-called assault weapons, not all guns or guns in general. You said “guns”, Binky:
All assault weapons are guns, yes. But only a gun with a nickel-cobalt M331 bayonet mount is correctly defined as an “assault weapon”. Other weapons which look similar…big, black, scary…are also targeted by gun grubs for annihilation and/or confiscation, and they are simply guns. Hence, the gun grubs are after all guns, since they are not capable of making precise distinctions.
After a while, you begin to see how they think. Which worries me some, as a matter of mental hygiene.
However, in this case, the precise distinction was not made by the OP.
Yeah, assault weapons are guns. But, you’re right, it would have been more precise to say the AAP wants to ban assault weapons (I wonder how many kids are killed by assault weapons every year).