I do. Sadly, we didn’t get to discuss it in good faith.
No. I don’t think that’s the case. I think you would have had an argument if Bush tried to publicize this, or held an open ceremony with the press. It was pretty low key though. I wouldn’t have known about without this thread. It didn’t make CNN or Fox that I’m aware of. The only reason I think that we know about it is because of the guy who was giving it.
Warning: Hijack. But I’m not going to open another pit thread and annoy Tomndeb.
Liberal’s hypocrisy would be astounding if it weren’t his regular style. I wasn’t brought up to the level of Southern Gentility he claims, but I was taught that if someone addresses you in a reasonably polite manner, it is rather rude to ignore his communication. I pitted Lib/C.W. a couple weeks ago (the first time I have pitted anyone, and I hope the last) because when I politely disagreed with some points he was trying to make, and even more politely asked him specifically to answer me, he first insulted me, then performed the message board equivalent of putting his nose in the air and turning his back. Just what he claims his Southern upbringing wouldn’t possibly allow him to do. He’s a hypocrite, but you all already knew that, so this post doesn’t really carry much weight, I suppose.
I still don’t get the whole “To reject a compliment that goes too far would be an insult itself” thing. I’d say quite the opposite; to accept an accolade that you didn’t earn or deserve would be an insult to anyone who recieved it genuinely. It would make you look pretty self-centred, too. Not that i’m bashing Liberal’s Southern upbringing; just pointing out that there are other views of politeness to someone who’s never heard it to be bad. I suppose you could call it *my * Southern upbringing.
Oh, come now, Scylla. I have had a great deal of respect for you, but how is an insult remotely like being physically wounded? Hyperbole and exaggeration are one thing, but this is fucking ridiculous. If someone calls me nasty names, that’s going to make me feel bad, but that is in no way comparable to getting shot or hit by shrapnel or what have you. It’s disingenuous to imply that they are even vaguely equivalent.
You appear to be arguing from the general to the specific here, Scylla. Speaking as one who hopes that some day at least some of those consequences befall Mr. Chimpy (although my level of hopefulness that they will is so low as to make “wishes for” a more useful term), I’d like to ask you to list which consequences you believe already have befallen him. I do not insist that they come from the list of examples you gave.
ETA: I don’t even insist that you support any assertion you wish to make that any accusation against him that led to a consequence actually be false.
I don’t really want to do that kaylasdad. I’d rather be general than specific. I have been specific in the past. Here. On this board. About the damages of specific accusations. It has gotten very very ugly. You may remember some of these.
I’ll give Two:
“Bush want to torture” “Bush want to eavesdrop and take away our freedoms”
Both of these are seriously damaging accusations both personally and professionally. They have consequences for our troops abroad and they have consequences for his ability to be an effective President.
I could give dozens more from the last several years, but that’s enough. I’d like to avoid incivility and namecalling, so I’m not going to off on a tangent on these.
Hmmm, I wonder if any soldiers in Iraq are praying tonight, “God please anything but a pen”?
CMC fnord!
Maybe you didn’t notice or just forgot, here, read some of these stories, when you stop feeling sick, come back and tell me “the pen is mightier than the sword”.
I’d love to finish this with some vicious, personal attack, filled with Pit worthy vitriol,
but your just not worthy of it anymore.
I do know 24,645 soldiers who would like to have a word or two with you.
I would say those are objective observations, not false accusations. It isn’t slander if it’s true. Any damage he sustains is from his own actions, not his getting called on them.
Or are you going to deny that he’s eavesdropped and tortured? Even if you do want to dispute the truth of those allegations (and I don’t know how you could, he’s admitted to the eavesdropping himself and made only the most semantic denials of torture), it still isn’t slander if the accusers (like me) sincerely believe it, and we do.
Am I an enemy of the US if I say out loud that Bush has illegally eavesdropped on Americans and used torture on prisoners?
Defend your premise. Who authenticates citations? You?
Not what happened. The citation wasn’t “fake” (whatever that means). The medal was neither earned nor unearned; it was a gift. And there was no mock ceremony. It was a private affair in the Oval Office.
And I’d wager that you have defended private affairs in the Oval Office before.
Is this a trick question? The US Military, who do you think?
It was fake as in “not authentic.”
The medal is not the issue. Accepting it as a gift is fine. Accepting in the context of a fake citation and ceremony is offensive. Not illegal, just offensive.
Then may I suggest that you give your chimpdetestin gland the night off, and treat his little play time with his friends with the mock derision that it merits?
If he wants to sing into his hairbrush in the bathroom and pretend he’s Blake Lewis, you wouldn’t call for his public pillorying for disrespecting and cheapening the hard work of the American Idol finalists, would you? And if he did the same thing in his jammies in the Lincoln bedroom for the benefit of some little friends he was having in for a sleepover, I’d hope the strongest reaction that would elicit would be a cringing eye-roll.
Same thing. One of his little friends brought him a souvenir and some refrigerator art, and they played dress-up for twenty minutes. Then the friend went back home and turned in a paper about "WhaT I did onMy Summer Va[del]kash[/del]cashun."
There really is more important stuff for us to get wound up over.
The couple wrote and presented the president with a citation.
All of the above was done to honor the couple, not the president.
In that case, I would like to honor all of you. Send gifts and citations through Paypal.
Does anyone have presedence for presidents accepting military honors which they have not strictly earned? Maybe this is done frequently on a ceremonial basis. If it is, I think it should be curtailed.
No, Liberal, it’s not just because it’s Bush. It’s because acceptance of an unearned military medal – especially when you are the person who conveys the medal – is just too tacky for words. It’s gauche.
Inviting the Thomases to the White House was just fine and even temporarily accepting the citation would have been okay perhaps. But the medal should never have been accepted. The president should have explained that the honor is Mr. Thomas’s and his descendents forever and why that cannot be transferred. It wouldn’t hurt to talk about the American tradition of open debate. Give the couple a citation in writing affirming all of this. Then send them back home with the medal and the gratitude of the President of the United States. Everybody is happy.
This is the kind of moronicism that makes this kind of thread vaguely amusing in a sort of PALATR way. Even when Bush says specifically that he doesn’t feel he deserves the award, that means that he does think it.
If you can convince yourself of that, you can convince yourself of anything. Like I said, you asses Pit everything Bush does, and if he doesn’t do it, you pretend he did and Pit him anyways.
The guy who received it genuinely, three times, doesn’t think so.