No. This is being disingenuous again. These were not completely unconnected posts, but a reply to a poster who was talking about your previous post. Here is the entire conversation thread.
Click to read quoted posts
You pretended that LHOD had said that “the concept of biological sex being something distinct from gender identity” is transphobic. He never said anything like that. He replied to your post, which was saying discrimination against trans women is okay in “biological female” spaces.
You are, as you were told in the thread (and in my post), wrong about what Stonewall said. They attacked gender critical feminists, aka trans exclusionary radical feminists or TERFs, for being transphobic, and said that their transphobia was equivalent to antisemitism.
At no point has anyone claimed that “the concept of biological sex being something distinct from gender identity” is transphobic. By arguing that, you were creating a strawman—a classic disingenuous argument tactic.
Neither is anyone actually arguing that “biological women” need a space separate from “biological men.” You don’t see any of these groups arguing that both cis women and trans men should be able to exclude cis men and trans women. As I pointed out ,GCFs exclude trans men as well, because they refuse to accept that they are men in any sense.
GCFs are themselves being disingenuous when they claim their argument is about “sex is real” or “wanting a safe space for biological women.” They were condemned for what they actually do.
The KKK of transphobia were condemned. They tried disingenuous arguments, and were condemned again. There is nothing wrong with that.