I never claimed anyone said those words. They were part of a clearly fabricated conversation that was prefaced by calling it a “no true scotsman scenario” how much clearer do you need it to be?
here it is in full context
It is a no true Scotsman scenario.
“we won’t engage with bigots”
***“OK, lets hear your proposals”
“here are our proposals”
***“I have some reservations about your proposals”
“Only a bigot would refuse to agree with us fully”
***“But I disagree with some aspects of your proposals and I’m not a bigot”
“bigot! we will not engage with your hate speech”
Under no circumstances could anyone mistake that as an attempt to report actual speech within the thread.
Even worse, when LHOD states that no-one in the thread said that, what was my response? Why here it is
That is my impression of the position that Stonewall seem to be taking
Again, how much clearer do you need it?
Would you care to retract your “lies” accusation? Or are you standing by your assertion that I purposefully created that conversation scenario as a serious attempt at representing an actual quote by a poster in the thread? Does not the preface and the follow-up make things crystal clear?