I pit General Casey's political correctness

[Jolly_Roger]

@What_the

That soldier’s sacrifice is as great a tragedy as the Ft Hood massacre but what does it have to do with Diversity. The kind with a capital D that stands above all other military goals.

I appreciate your service and would be interested in your first hand knowledge of how we can keep Muslims from turning into terrorists.

I work currently for the Army’s only active Psychological Operations Group. I can’t tell you how, because even the mundane operations are classified. Still you can look up 4th PSYOP GRP and draw your own conclusions.

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

Did you read The Men Who Stare At Goats, JR?

[What_the]

@Really_Not_All_That_Bright

Er… lots? What the hell kind of question is that?

It’s not that moderate Muslims turn into jihadists. It’s that moderate Muslims may hear other Muslims talking about the US/West going to war with Islam, and decide they must fight America. They may not even decide to do it in the name of Islam, but simply on behalf of Muslims, who they perceive as being persecuted by the US.

Consider Abu Ghraib. The Arab world saw Americans acting just as extremist religious leaders said they did - cruel, sexually depraved, and so on.

In contrast, our own Bear_Nenno, while deployed to Iraq, solicited donation of toys and clothing from people back home (and on these boards) to hand out to the local kids, who obviously weren’t having much fun in the middle of a war zone, even a relatively peaceful one.

Which of those two images do you think is more likely to turn a moderate Muslim into a jihadist?

I’m an Obama supporter. I hear crazy right wingers talking constantly about how he’s a socialist/communist/Marxist/fascist, etc. Because I have a functioning brain, I pay no attention. However, my views might be changed somewhat if I turned on the TV tomorrow and saw him close a speech with Sig Heil!, or wear a hammer-and-sickle lapel pin…

Well if moderate Muslims are that likely to condone or turn into terrorist killers that says something fundamental about the religion.

Rather than look the other way for the sake of Diversity, maybe we should look a little more closely.

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

It says that the religion predominates in areas of the world where the populace are likely to view themselves as the victim of foreign interference in their politics. It’s not an unreasonable view- we do interfere in their politics, and usually it was to the detriment of the people, in historic terms.

Heck, our most recent “contribution” to Middle Eastern affairs was liberating Kuwait, which made us look good. Then we told the Iraqi people to rise up against Saddam, which they promptly did… and were slaughtered when coalition forces walked out on them.

[Beware_of_Doug]

@What_the

That soldier’s sacrifice is as great a tragedy as the Ft Hood massacre but what does it have to do with Diversity. The kind with a capital D that stands above all other military goals.

Oh shit, here we go again.

[Ludovic]

@Hyperelastic

On the other hand, Hurricane Katrina, an actual natural disaster, as we know was All Bush’s Fault.

Of course he had nothing to do with the severity of the disaster! He did a heckuva job!

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

Ludo doesn’t care about folksy people.

[Gorsnak]

@Beware_of_Doug

Oh shit, here we go again.

And here I thought you’d been kidding about diversity vs “diversity”. Silly me.

[What_the]

No such thing as political correctness??

Even Time magazine appears to be shocked at this.